2014
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The revised Lund-Malmö GFR estimating equation outperforms MDRD and CKD-EPI across GFR, age and BMI intervals in a large Swedish population

Abstract: The revised Lund-Malmo GFR estimating equation outperforms MDRD and CKD-EPI across GFR, age and BMI intervals in a large Swedish populationNyman, Ulf; Grubb, Anders; Larsson, Anders; Hansson, Lars-Olof; Flodin, Mats; Nordin, Gunnar; Lindstrom, Veronica; Björk, Jonas General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the lega… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
147
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
147
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear regression with 1/mGFR as regression weights was used to increase the importance of patients with low GFR (11 ). The regression equation above corresponds to an eGFR equation of the following form:…”
Section: Development and Internal Validation Of New Cystatin C-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear regression with 1/mGFR as regression weights was used to increase the importance of patients with low GFR (11 ). The regression equation above corresponds to an eGFR equation of the following form:…”
Section: Development and Internal Validation Of New Cystatin C-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses were performed during November 2015. Plasma creatinine was measured using an enzymatic colorimetric assay with an IDMS-traceable calibrator on the Hitachi Modular P analysis system 6 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) [13]. The total analytical imprecision was 3.0% (with a concentration of 60 µmol/L in control sample) and 1.4% (with a concentration of 578 µmol/L in control sample; normal reference range: 60-100 µmol/L for men and 50-90 µmol/L for women).…”
Section: Laboratory Assays and Gfr Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So were the LMrev [13] and CKD-EPIcreatinine [15] estimating equations based on creatinine. The best estimate of GFR is the mean of eGFRcystatin C and of eGFRcreatinine (eGFRmean) and this is true also when eGFRcystatin C and eGFRcreatinine differ significantly [13,[15][16][17][18]. We used the eGFRmean to describe the renal function in the whole cohort.…”
Section: Laboratory Assays and Gfr Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that have been done in adults over 70 years of age from the general population have examined creatinine and cystatin C with focus on the CKDEpidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study (MDRD), and Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations, with some studies including other equations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . These equations have been compared to Lund-Malmö Revised (LM-REV) [19] , CaucasianAsian-Pediatric-Adult (CAPA) and the mean of the latter 2 in an older population in a clinical setting [20,21] . Further validation studies of these equations in external populations will improve their generalisability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%