1971
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(71)80195-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The revised Denver Developmental Screening Test: Its accuracy as a screening instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Denver scale (9,10) for each subgroup separately. Multinominal logistic analyses were applied, because the outcome measure had three classes (10).…”
Section: Family-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Denver scale (9,10) for each subgroup separately. Multinominal logistic analyses were applied, because the outcome measure had three classes (10).…”
Section: Family-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Child-related factors were examined as a separate entity. The child's medical visits and illnesses (Table II) were examined using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the data of the Denver test (8,9) using the Anova test.…”
Section: Family-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the DOST has been shown by Frankenburg, Goldstein & Camp (1971) to be capable of accurately evaluating several salient areas rather than simply providing a nondeflnltlve global score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 T h e W o r l d H e a l t h Organization (WHO) considers that at least 5% of the population suffers a psychomotor development disorder, 2 which is more common in developing countries. 3,4 The Committee on Children of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that preventive care visits throughout the first 5 years of life should include a structured and systematic surveillance of development using standardized d e v e l o p m e n t a l s c r e e n i n g t e s t s administered, at least, at three ages (9,18, and 24 or 30 months old) and autism detection tests should also be administered at 18 and 36 months old. 5 This is based on different studies that have demonstrated that pediatricians' clinical judgment is not enough to identify delays during health checkups because they are not able to detect 30-50% of psychomotor development deficits so that early interventions could be implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Detection may be done using questionnaires or tests, depending on their administration ( Table 1). The Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST-II) 9 helps to detect developmental problems occurring between 0 and 6 years old. It explores four areas: gross motor, fine motoradaptive, language, and personal-social skills, which are assessed by observing the child's performance and asking In Latin America, the National Screening Test (Prueba Nacional de Pesquisa, PRUNAPE) is the adaptation of the DDST-II and has been validated in a population of 106 children in Argentina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%