The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R)

Eisen, Susan V.; Normand, Sharon‐Lise T.; Belanger, Albert J.; Spiro, Avron; Esch, David

doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010

Cited by 249 publications

(194 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

192

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The BASIS-24 is a 24-item self-report scale of functioning and symptoms (41). The scale is routinely used at RUBHC for all clients at intake.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sample included all active clients at RUBHC between January 2007 and November 2010 who were screened for PTSD after the implementation of the CBT study (31) and for whom there were electronic data from the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24 [41]), another routine screening tool used at RUBHC. We have excluded from our analysis the 201 clients who participated in the CBT study because they received the special treatment that the study was focused on and inclusion would have inflated the service use data for our analysis.…”

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Service Use and Self-Reported Symptoms Among Persons With Positive PTSD Screens and Serious Mental Illness

Minsky

Silverstein

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The BASIS-24 is a 24-item self-report scale of functioning and symptoms (41). The scale is routinely used at RUBHC for all clients at intake.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

Service Use and Self-Reported Symptoms Among Persons With Positive PTSD Screens and Serious Mental Illness

Minsky

Silverstein

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Treatment outcomes were measured with the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS- 24), a self-report instrument that measures difficulty in several major symptom and functional domains (28-30). It is used across the diagnostic spectrum in outpatient settings to measure the outcome of interventions over time.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is used across the diagnostic spectrum in outpatient settings to measure the outcome of interventions over time. It has been normed with black and white patients (28-30). Respondents are asked to indicate the degree of difficulty they have experienced during the past week.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinician Factors Related to Outcome Differences Between Black and White Patients at CMHCs

Larrison¹

2011

Psychiatric Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Data are limited on how clinicians contribute to outcome differences between black patients and white patients. Because the clinician-patient relationship is the foundation of mental health services, understanding clinicians’ role in outcome differences may help identify evidence-based interventions that decrease disparities and capitalize on positive differences. Symptoms and functioning in a sample of black and white adults receiving outpatient services were examined to determine the effects of their primary clinician on those patterns. Methods The study included 551 patients (25% black) with serious mental illness and 62 mental health professionals (21% black) identified as the patients’ primary clinician. Treatment outcomes were measured at baseline and two follow-ups (two and four months) with the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale, a measure of symptoms and functioning. Data were analyzed with hierarchical linear modeling. Clinicians’ levels of multi-cultural competence, burnout, and education were analyzed. Results Clinicians moderated the relationship between patient race and outcome differences. There was significant variability among clinicians: approximately 20% had black patients whose outcomes were worse than those of their white patients, and 40% had black patients with better outcomes than their white patients. The only clinician factor predicting these differences was clinician's general experiences and relationships with people from racial-ethnic and cultural groups other than their own. Conclusions The occurrence of outcome differences varied across clinicians, with some clinicians magnifying outcome differences between black and white patients and others minimizing them. Factors other than clinicians’ race, multicultural competence, education, and burnout may contribute to outcome differences between black and white patients.

show abstract

“…Additional clinical covariates were smoking status, BMI, and a self-reported Charlson Comorbidity Index (a measure of overall comorbidity) (21,22). Mental health covariates included the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) memory index score (an indicator of the extent of cognitive impairment) (9,23) and two subscales from the revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale assessing psychotic symptoms and depression (24). The RBANS memory index score is expressed as an age-adjusted standard score with a mean of ;100 and an SD of ;15.…”

Section: Covariatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Glucose Control and Medication Adherence Among Veterans With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Does Collocation of Primary Care and Mental Health Care Matter?

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVEPersons with serious mental illness (SMI) may benefit from collocation of medical and mental health healthcare professionals and services in attending to their chronic comorbid medical conditions. We evaluated and compared glucose control and diabetes medication adherence among patients with SMI who received collocated care to those not receiving collocated care (which we call usual care). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe performed a cross-sectional, observational cohort study of 363 veteran patients with type 2 diabetes and SMI who received care from one of three Veterans Affairs medical facilities: two sites that provided both collocated and usual care and one site that provided only usual care. Through a survey, laboratory tests, and medical records, we assessed patient characteristics, glucose control as measured by a current HbA 1c , and adherence to diabetes medication as measured by the medication possession ration (MPR) and self-report. RESULTSIn the sample, the mean HbA 1c was 7.4% (57 mmol/mol), the mean MPR was 80%, and 51% reported perfect adherence to their diabetes medications. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, there were no differences in glucose control and medication adherence by collocation of care. Patients seen in collocated care tended to have better HbA 1c levels (b = 20.149; P = 0.393) and MPR values (b = 0.34; P = 0.132) and worse self-reported adherence (odds ratio 0.71; P = 0.143), but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONSIn a population of veterans with comorbid diabetes and SMI, patients on average had good glucose control and medication adherence regardless of where they received primary care.

show abstract

The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R)

Abstract: Analyses of the BASIS-24 supported its reliability and validity for assessing mental health status from the patient's perspective.

Cited by 249 publications

References 27 publications

Service Use and Self-Reported Symptoms Among Persons With Positive PTSD Screens and Serious Mental Illness

Service Use and Self-Reported Symptoms Among Persons With Positive PTSD Screens and Serious Mental Illness

Clinician Factors Related to Outcome Differences Between Black and White Patients at CMHCs

Glucose Control and Medication Adherence Among Veterans With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Does Collocation of Primary Care and Mental Health Care Matter?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About