2021
DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The revised Approved Instructional Resources score: An improved quality evaluation tool for online educational resources

Abstract: Background: Free Open-Access Medical education (FOAM) use among residents continues to rise. However, it often lacks quality assurance processes and residents receive little guidance on quality assessment. The Academic Life in Emergency Medicine Approved Instructional Resources tool (AAT) was created for FOAM appraisal by and for expert educators and has demonstrated validity in this context. It has yet to be evaluated in other populations. Objectives: We assessed the AAT's usability in a diverse population of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several other tools in existence for the evaluation of FOAM 23–30 . The rMETRIQ score is a more recent tool developed but has yet to be formally assessed for validity and reliability, though initial testing indicates improved reliability 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several other tools in existence for the evaluation of FOAM 23–30 . The rMETRIQ score is a more recent tool developed but has yet to be formally assessed for validity and reliability, though initial testing indicates improved reliability 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 There are several other tools in existence for the evaluation of FOAM. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The rMETRIQ score is a more recent tool developed but has yet to be formally assessed for validity and reliability, though initial testing indicates improved reliability. 16 In addition, we continued to use a high-quality designation (rMETRIQ ≥ 16) as was done in prior SOAR reviews.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%