2001
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2002.12069030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Revised Almost Perfect Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
618
6
19

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 776 publications
(664 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
21
618
6
19
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, there may be other, more recently developed, assessments that could better capture clinical perfectionism, such as measures designed specifically to assess only pathological perfectionism and not a combination of two dimensional measures of perfectionism (e.g., Dickie, Surgenor, Wilson, & McDowall, 2012). However, we should note that both scales we used purport to measure very similar perfectionism constructs (Frost et al, 1990; Slaney et al, 2001). Furthermore, our data was from several different universities, which could have influenced how participants responded to measures and we did not assess inter-rater reliability in all of the clinical participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, there may be other, more recently developed, assessments that could better capture clinical perfectionism, such as measures designed specifically to assess only pathological perfectionism and not a combination of two dimensional measures of perfectionism (e.g., Dickie, Surgenor, Wilson, & McDowall, 2012). However, we should note that both scales we used purport to measure very similar perfectionism constructs (Frost et al, 1990; Slaney et al, 2001). Furthermore, our data was from several different universities, which could have influenced how participants responded to measures and we did not assess inter-rater reliability in all of the clinical participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001). The APS-R contains three subscales: Discrepancy (12 items), Personal Standards (7 items), and order (4 items), measured on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 7 ( strongly agree ).…”
Section: Methods: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impulsivity was measured with the 30-item Barratt Impulsivity Scale (Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), and conscientiousness was measured with the 9-item conscientiousness subscale of a short version of the Neo-Five Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992), both on a 1–5 scale. Perfectionism was measured (on a 1–7 scale) with the standards subscale of the Almost Perfect Scale (Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001). Academic motivation was measured (on a 1–5 scale) with the 33-item Internal/External Motivation Scale (Lepper, Corpus, & Iyengar, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining the underlying structure of multidimensional perfectionism measures (e.g., the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale [FMPS] and Hewitt and Fletcher Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale [HFMPS]), have found evidence for two factors, reflecting Maladaptive Perfectionism (Concern over Mistakes, Doubts about Action, Parental Criticism, and Parental Expectations from the FMPS and Socially-Prescribed Perfectionism from the HFMPS) and Achievement Striving (Personal Standards and Organization from the FMPS and Self-Oriented Perfectionism and Other-Oriented Perfectionism from the HFMPS) (Frost, Heimberg, Holt, Mattia, Neubauer, 1993; Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, and Ashby, 2001). The associations between eating disorder behaviors and the two dimensions of perfectionism have been investigated in several studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%