2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reverse mortgage conundrum: Perspectives of older households in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…less than 10% before the concept clarification during the questionnaire research. Contrary to the perceived financial consumers' benevolence towards the RM adoption in the Netherlands, according to 31 interview of people aged over 65 years, RMs are quite unpopular in Australia, mainly because of the desire to avoid debt and to retain a home for security and precautionary reasons (Whait et al, 2019).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Rm Introduction And Acceptancementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…less than 10% before the concept clarification during the questionnaire research. Contrary to the perceived financial consumers' benevolence towards the RM adoption in the Netherlands, according to 31 interview of people aged over 65 years, RMs are quite unpopular in Australia, mainly because of the desire to avoid debt and to retain a home for security and precautionary reasons (Whait et al, 2019).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Rm Introduction And Acceptancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…With regards to the argument about the far-reaching favorable impact of the RM, calculations for the e.g. UK predict that every 1 GBP of wealth released through RM generates 2,34 GBP for the wider economy via multiplier effects (Whait et al, 2019). At last, improving the social welfare of senior citizens by RM loans approval should dampen public costs in the social security area, and consequently stimulate personal consumption expenditures throughout enhanced perception of the sustainability of social security systems (Kobayashi et al, 2017, p. 100).…”
Section: A General Insight Into the Rm Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian home owners have so far proved reluctant to reduce their share of home equity through such products (Whait, Lowies et al 2019), but for people who are not home owners, the prospect of becoming so through shared equity arrangements may be more appealing. Products in this regard may include fractional property ownership (Lowies, Whait et al 2018) and property crowdfunding (Lowies, Viljoen et al 2017).…”
Section: Alternative Housing Models For Older Lower Income Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peculiarities of the United States, Australia and Japan, to name three non-European markets where this product has been implemented, can be found in Huan and Mahoney (2002), Chatterjee (2016), and Davidoff et al (2017); Ong (2008) and Whait et al (2019); and Mitchell and Piggott (2004), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy, Fornero et al (2016) focused on the determinants of interest in RM and found that the main predictors of higher interest in RM are risk aversion and negative expectations about living standards after retirement. Likewise, in Australia, Whait et al (2019) highlighted the extraordinary negative vision that people have about RMs, which is reinforced by high interest rates and expenses. Instead, the bequest motive is not a definitive argument against RM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%