2009
DOI: 10.3758/pbr.16.3.463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The revelation effect for autobiographical memory: A mixture-model analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the increased familiarity for the revealed items appeared to be limited to the recall phase of the experiment (where the revelation manipulation occurred) and did not persist into the recognition task (cf. Bernstein et al, 2009).…”
Section: Experiments 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the increased familiarity for the revealed items appeared to be limited to the recall phase of the experiment (where the revelation manipulation occurred) and did not persist into the recognition task (cf. Bernstein et al, 2009).…”
Section: Experiments 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Westerman and Greene (1996) showed the indirect effect, many researchers confirmed the effect using various cognitive tasks: letter-counting tasks, memory span tests, synonym-generation tasks (Westerman & Greene, 1998), tasks of determining attractiveness ratings for inverted faces (Bornstein & Wilson, 2004), articulatory suppression tasks (Miura & Itoh, 2016), tasks of pressing arrow keys (Aßfalg, Currie, & Bernstein, 2017), revealed tasks (Bornstein & Neely, 2001;Westerman & Greene, 1998), numerical addition tasks (Leynes, Landau, Walker, & Addante, 2005;, and anagram tasks (Aßfalg, Currie et al, 2017;Aßfalg & Nadarevic, 2015;Azimian-Faridani & Wilding, 2004;Bernstein, Rudd, Erdfelder, Godfrey, & Loftus, 2009;Bernstein, Whittlesea, & Loftus, 2002;Cameron & Hockley, 2000;Kronlund & Bernstein, 2006;Major & Hockley, 2007;Miura & Itoh, 2016;Verde & Rotello, 2003Westerman, 2000;Westerman, Miller, & Lloyd, 2017;Young, Peynircioğlu, & Hohman, 2009). While it has been shown that various cognitive tasks cause the revelation effect, few studies have found tasks that do not cause the effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revelation effect is the increased probability to call a stimulus familiar, a choice preferable, or a statement true immediately following an intervening task compared to a condition without an intervening task (Bernstein, Rudd, Erdfelder, Godfrey, & Loftus, 2009;Bernstein, Whittlesea, & Loftus, 2002;Kronlund & Bernstein, 2006;Watkins & Peynircioglu, 1990). In recognition experiments, for example, participants are more likely to call a word (e.g., railroad) ''old'' after solving an anagram of that word (e.g., dirnopar -railroad) compared to a condition without anagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several authors argued that the revelation effect is the byproduct of a judgment heuristic based on processing fluency (Aßfalg & Bernstein, 2012;Bernstein et al, 2002Bernstein et al, , 2009Whittlesea & Williams, 2001). Fluency is the ease and speed of information processing and informs judgments of familiarity, truth, and attractiveness, among others (Alter & Oppenheimer, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%