2019
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjz036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Return to Protectionism*

Abstract: After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms that buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

32
298
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
32
298
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, if the tariff's incidence falls primarily on the importer, the ex-tariff import price will be relatively stable, raising the total cost the importer must pay (inclusive of tariffs) to buy foreign goods. 2 Our analyses indicate that the price incidence of US import tariffs falls largely on the United States, consistent with the results obtained using Census unit values in Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein (2019) and Fajgelbaum, Goldberg, Kennedy, and Khandelwal (2019).This result does not, of course, imply that China benefits from the policy. Even if Chinese exporters earned the same price and profit margin per unit exported to the United States, the tariffs would reduce the number of units sold.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Alternatively, if the tariff's incidence falls primarily on the importer, the ex-tariff import price will be relatively stable, raising the total cost the importer must pay (inclusive of tariffs) to buy foreign goods. 2 Our analyses indicate that the price incidence of US import tariffs falls largely on the United States, consistent with the results obtained using Census unit values in Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein (2019) and Fajgelbaum, Goldberg, Kennedy, and Khandelwal (2019).This result does not, of course, imply that China benefits from the policy. Even if Chinese exporters earned the same price and profit margin per unit exported to the United States, the tariffs would reduce the number of units sold.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Because President Trump's election was a surprise to many observers, it is unlikely that the tariffs were anticipated in the affected industries. Although the extent to which the tariff changes were a surprise could have changed over time as the trade war unfolded, Fajgelbaum et al (2019) find little evidence of pre-trends in the affected industries. In addition, the Trump administration's tariffs are large enough to create meaningful variation across products, time, and countries, which makes it relatively straightforward to discern their effects using conventional datasets.…”
Section: How Did Tariffs Affect Us Prices?mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The tariffs introduced by the Trump administration during 2018 have stimulated a burgeoning literature on their economic effects, including Fajgelbaum et al (2019), Flaaen, Hortaçsu, and Tintelnot (2019), and Cavallo et al (2019). In this article, we use these 2018 tariffs as a natural experiment to illustrate the conventional conceptual framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now turn to the (short-term) price and welfare effects of the tariff increases on the United States analyzed in various studies based on observed changes in the data. Various publications on this come to a similar conclusion (Amiti et al, 2019a(Amiti et al, , 2019bFajgelbaum et al, 2019;and Cavallo et al, 2019) on the price effects in the US. Both in 2018 and 2019 there has been a complete passthrough of US tariffs to importer prices.…”
Section: Insights From the Literature With Ex Post Analysesmentioning
confidence: 56%