Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2006
DOI: 10.3386/w12464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Return to English in a Non-English Speaking Country: Russian Immigrants and Native Israelis in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berman, Lang and Siniver (2003) and Lang and Siniver (2006) find evidence of languageskill complementarity in the Israeli context. Immigrant workers in high-skilled occupations received larger wage increases when they learned Hebrew and English (on top of their own native language, Russian).…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Returns To Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Berman, Lang and Siniver (2003) and Lang and Siniver (2006) find evidence of languageskill complementarity in the Israeli context. Immigrant workers in high-skilled occupations received larger wage increases when they learned Hebrew and English (on top of their own native language, Russian).…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Returns To Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies that estimate the effect of a colonial language are Angrist and Lavy (1997), who estimate the return to French-language skills in Morocco, and Levinsohn (2007), who estimates the returns to speaking English in South Africa. Two that estimate the effect of foreign languages that do not have a colonial past in the country are Saiz and Zoido (2005) and Lang and Siniver (2006). Saiz and Zoido estimate the returns to Spanish, French and other foreign languages among U.S. college graduates.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evidence suggests that the return to FL skills is still positive when estimated by using either the individual fixed-effects or instrumental variable methods (see Saiz & Zoido, 2005;Lang & Siniver, 2009;Ginsburgh & Prieto-Rodríguez, 2011, among others). In our case, the stability of the results regarding returns to English skills supports our argument that the earnings premium associated with an increasing level of competences in this FL should not be entirely driven by omitted variable bias.…”
Section: Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the majority of studies focuses on returns to the language of the destination country of immigrants, starting with early work by Carliner (1981) and McManus et al (1983), and concluding in IV estimates of language skill returns by Chiswick and Miller (1995), Dustmann and van Soest (2002) and Bleakley and Chin (2004). Second, a variety of studies addressed the positive labor market e ects of speaking a second foreign language in general (Ginsburgh and Prieto-Rodriguez, 2007;Garrouste, 2008;Williams, 2006), or in the context of immigration by Toomet (2011) and Lang and Siniver (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%