1992
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400060025x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Return of von Liebig's “Law of the Minimum”

Abstract: The development of optimal fertilizer recommendations requires a renewed collaborative effort between agronomists and agricultural economists. The purpose of this study is to emphasize the direction of this interdisciplinary effort in the area of crop response analysis. Using information from two separate experiments [corn (Zea mays L.) response to N and P fertilization and cotton lint (Gossypium hirsutum) response to N and irrigation water], it is shown that the best response model is a von Liebig specificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to the more complex (e.g., Fisher et al 2008), without a concomitant increase in accuracy. One reason that simple models work as well as multifactor models is that plant productivity (and transpiration) tend to be limited by a single factor at a given time and place (Liebig's law of the minimum) (Paris 1992), although at the community level co-limiting factor might operate (Danger et al 2008).…”
Section: Limitations Of VI Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the more complex (e.g., Fisher et al 2008), without a concomitant increase in accuracy. One reason that simple models work as well as multifactor models is that plant productivity (and transpiration) tend to be limited by a single factor at a given time and place (Liebig's law of the minimum) (Paris 1992), although at the community level co-limiting factor might operate (Danger et al 2008).…”
Section: Limitations Of VI Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final criterion for choosing the Mitscherlich functional form is based on a theoretical viewpoint. It has been shown that this functional form accords best with the von Liebig hypothesis known as the "Law of the Minimum" (Paris 1992a, b, Sumelius 1993 1 .…”
Section: Results and Discussion N-response For Maizementioning
confidence: 56%
“…13 where we can observe a high number of secondary users as compared to primary users at the equilibrium position. These results are analogous with the law of minimum, where the less resource demanding species can grow and the equilibrium position is determined based on the most scarcest resource [19]. Figure 14 shows the region of mutual co-existence for both primary and secondary users, and the region where one type of users is competitively excluded from the bandwidth resource competition.…”
Section: The Varying Bandwidth Cooperative Cognitive Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The fitness is directly proportional to the maximum percapita growth rate of any species. According to [19], the fitness function can be described by the multiplication of each resource response to each other and the growth rate. So the fitness of primary and secondary users in term of the law of minimum, can be described as follow:…”
Section: Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%