2013
DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations

Abstract: In this paper, we review and discuss ten common methodological mistakes found in retrospective chart reviews. The retrospective chart review is a widely applicable research methodology that can be used by healthcare disciplines as a means to direct subsequent prospective investigations. In many cases in this review, we have also provided suggestions or accessible resources that researchers can apply as a “best practices” guide when planning, conducting, or reviewing this investigative method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
286
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
286
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our limitations include the retrospective collection of data, which may have some negative impact on the precision of the results, although several authors and consensus groups defend that personal health information can be collected with reasonable precision if specific and pre-defined questions are employed [25,26]. We have carefully respected the ten main recommendations published by Matt et al [27] to ensure a good collection of data in retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our limitations include the retrospective collection of data, which may have some negative impact on the precision of the results, although several authors and consensus groups defend that personal health information can be collected with reasonable precision if specific and pre-defined questions are employed [25,26]. We have carefully respected the ten main recommendations published by Matt et al [27] to ensure a good collection of data in retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, patients were identified from an existing MRI database making our study subject to limitations inherent to retrospective investigations (20). Despite this, we maintained a systematic and strict approach to determine inclusion eligibility.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following best practices from Vassar & Holzmann (2013), the PI and research associate of the chart review study drew up a manual for data extraction from the screening form and from the electronic records, in consultation with a SBHC clinic manager from the same FQHC as Clinic A. Clinic staff were used to extract data from the electronic records currently used by the FQHC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing data from screened youth was primarily a result of blanks on the screening forms, which may have been a function of language barriers for Guatemalan youth, a lack of understanding of the questions, and inconsistencies or skipped questions on the part of screeners, particularly if they noted any reluctance by youth. The analyzed sample (N= 56) was small relative to the number of variables, so inferential statistics were not possible (Vassar & Holzmann, 2013). Future chart reviews should narrow the number of questions asked in order to increase power of the sample and also in order to facilitate a more extensive chart review.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%