2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The retrosigmoid approach to petroclival meningioma surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 The conventional retrosigmoid approach has been used for lesions with significant mass in the posterior fossa and involving the cerebellopontine angle. 6,10,12,17,46,48 A modified approach, retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach, includes a retrosigmoid craniotomy and intradural drilling of the bone located above and anterior to the IAC. 49 The retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach is suitable for lesions mainly in the posterior fossa with some extension through Meckel's cave into the middle fossa.…”
Section: Surgical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 The conventional retrosigmoid approach has been used for lesions with significant mass in the posterior fossa and involving the cerebellopontine angle. 6,10,12,17,46,48 A modified approach, retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach, includes a retrosigmoid craniotomy and intradural drilling of the bone located above and anterior to the IAC. 49 The retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach is suitable for lesions mainly in the posterior fossa with some extension through Meckel's cave into the middle fossa.…”
Section: Surgical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the combined transpetrosal approach which was once considered to be the first option for PCMs [16] can provide a much wider vision and shorter distance to access to the petroclival area, when they significantly grow into both the middle and posterior fossae equally. Besides the disadvantages similar to a presigmoid transpetrosal approach it also increases a potential risk of damage to the facial nerve, hearing loss, and injury to the vein of Labbe [20] which lead to slow recovery and poor neurological outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages are obvious including: 1) Less trauma to patient, simpler approach for operator and less time consumption [18]. 2) Avoiding the injury of the traction of vein of Labbe and decreasing the iatrogenic complications [13,20]. 3) More abundant exposure of operative sight without more traction of cerebellum and venous sinus handling [20] to expose the deep regions of superior petrosal sinu, petrous apex, edge of tentorium and clivus and if needed, accompany with the incising of tentorium, the exposure can be extended to the whole region of clivus from dorsum sellae to foramen magnum region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suboccipital retrosigmoid approach was widely used to manipulate lesions in cerebellopontine angle and lower clivus (7,23). However, tumor removal had to be performed through the interspace of VII-XII cranial nerves.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%