2016
DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2016.01016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The retrieval of atrial septal defect closure device embolized into aortic arch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Device embolization can occur because of small right atrium, large ASD, deficient aortic rim (less than 5 mm), 3,5 undersizing of device, technical difficulty, and operator skill. 2 In our case, it was technical difficulty in loading Amplatzer device and deficient aortic rim. It took three attempts for the cardiologist to load the device that finally was placed over ASD but immediately got embolized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Device embolization can occur because of small right atrium, large ASD, deficient aortic rim (less than 5 mm), 3,5 undersizing of device, technical difficulty, and operator skill. 2 In our case, it was technical difficulty in loading Amplatzer device and deficient aortic rim. It took three attempts for the cardiologist to load the device that finally was placed over ASD but immediately got embolized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Device embolization is seen rarely but it can be fatal. It is seen in about 0.6% of cases [1] as high as 20% [3]. We report a complication of such closure in a 44-year-old man.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…When this complication is discovered early, within first 24 hours; the percutaneous retrieval is possible in 50% of cases using devices like endomyocardial biopsy or different kinds of snares [2]. The surgical approach allows both retrieving the device and closing the PFO/ASD [1]. When this complication was discovered after three months, although percutaneous retrieval was considered, the surgical approach was chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Hamur et al, in a case report, extracted a device (the authors did not know when the device has been embolized after the procedure) similar to our case with longitudinal aortic incision also from aortic arch in elective conditions. 10 But, Hamur et al performed ASD repair before removing the device. In our case, we extracted the device first, then performed ASD repair because of the unstable hemodynamic status of our patient and the risk of embolization of the device to a new site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%