2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The retirement cliff: Power plant lives and their policy implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Additionally, new power plants may offer advanced 6 technologies that enable improved heat rates, lower operating costs, lower emissions, and/or increased flexibility in operations, putting pressure on the economic position of older and smaller plants that use less-advanced technology EIA 2016;DOE 2017). Related, the operating costs of many existing plants are rising over time, as those plants age and reach the end of their planned lifetimes and/or face increased regulatory pressures as a consequence of environmental regulations (e.g., coal and gas plants) or relicensing needs (e.g., nuclear and hydropower) (Rode, Fischbeck, and Páez 2017;Pratson, Haerer, and Patiño-Echeverri 2013;DOE 2017;EIA 2017b;Linn and McCormack 2017;Burtraw et al 2012). The capacity-weighted age of coal and natural gas steam plants that retired from 2010-2016 was around 50 years; the same is largely true for planned retirements (Mills, Wiser, and Seel 2017).…”
Section: Executive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Additionally, new power plants may offer advanced 6 technologies that enable improved heat rates, lower operating costs, lower emissions, and/or increased flexibility in operations, putting pressure on the economic position of older and smaller plants that use less-advanced technology EIA 2016;DOE 2017). Related, the operating costs of many existing plants are rising over time, as those plants age and reach the end of their planned lifetimes and/or face increased regulatory pressures as a consequence of environmental regulations (e.g., coal and gas plants) or relicensing needs (e.g., nuclear and hydropower) (Rode, Fischbeck, and Páez 2017;Pratson, Haerer, and Patiño-Echeverri 2013;DOE 2017;EIA 2017b;Linn and McCormack 2017;Burtraw et al 2012). The capacity-weighted age of coal and natural gas steam plants that retired from 2010-2016 was around 50 years; the same is largely true for planned retirements (Mills, Wiser, and Seel 2017).…”
Section: Executive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Larson , 2016EIA 2016;Hibbard, Tierney, and Franklin 2017;DOE 2017;Linn and McCormack 2017;Haratyk 2017). There is uncertainty, however, on the relative contributions of various factors, and on the specific role of VRE growth(Rode, Fischbeck, and Páez 2017;Pratson, Haerer, and Patiño-Echeverri 2013;BNEF 2017;Houser, Bordoff, and Marsters 2017;Chang et al 2017;DOE 2017;Makovich and Richards 2017;Linn and McCormack 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lazard (2016) does not estimate hydroelectric life. Figure 5 compares the length of an average contract (represented by a 20-year PPA) plus RV, a range of estimated average operational lives based on several studies, and actual average operational lives based on recent retirements for coal and natural gas thermal plants from a study by Rode, Fischbeck, and Páez (2017). The third and sixth columns shows the 10 th , 30 th , and 50 th percentiles for the retirement ages for coal and natural gas plants, respectively.…”
Section: Differences Between Ppa Periods and Operational Lives Of Genmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of lifespans for wind turbines and solar arrays vary depending on location, weather stresses, and engineering, but are generally no more than about one human generation. The lifespans of giant wind turbines in most locations are estimated to be 20-25 years [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%