1957
DOI: 10.1037/h0093772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The retinal size of a familiar object as a determiner of apparent distance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later research produced findings which suggested that familiar size could be considered as the primary cue differentiating between relative and absolute distance (Gogel, Hartman, & Harker, 1957).…”
Section: --7_mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later research produced findings which suggested that familiar size could be considered as the primary cue differentiating between relative and absolute distance (Gogel, Hartman, & Harker, 1957).…”
Section: --7_mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for considering relative size as a cue to relative distance is based on the fact that the same object produces a different difference in visual directions at various distances. Its effectiveness has been well documented (e.g., Epstein, 1961;Gogel, Hartman, & Harker, 1957;Hochberg & Hochberg, 1952;Hochberg & McAlister, 1955;Ono, 1966Ono, , 1969, although the relevant variable in those studies was thought to be different retinal image sizes. In other words, whenever 5 has information concerning, or assumes, stimulus identity (i.e., that the stimuli presented are the same stimulus or of constant linear size), variations in the perceived angular size of the stimulus may serve as a relative size cue to relative distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claimed, in fact, that familiar size was one of the cues' to absolute distance. Their experiments were subsquently shown by Gogel, Hartman, and Harker (1957) to be methodologically inadequate, and for some time thereafter there was considerable dispute concerning the familiar-size cue to absolute distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%