The Results of the 20-Year Economic Cooperation of the shanghai Cooperation Organization and its Development Prospects

Li, Xin; Wang, Yu-X.

doi:10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-3-159-174

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The existing mechanisms for economic cooperation at SCO have also had limited success (Dovgalyuk, 2019), which in the past were stymied by Russia seeking to avoid a China‐dominated organization. The bilateral level of engagement dominates trade ties among members (Xin & Wang, 2021). China too has focused on using BRI for advancing its policies in the region and creating structures like Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), displaying an “uneven interest” toward the SCO (Shumkova & Korolev, 2018).…”

Section: The Institutionalization Of Gep: What Stands In the Way Of I...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Wither the Greater Eurasian Partnership? Challenges from the East in an evolving world order

Kapoor

2024

Asian Politics and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The idea of the Greater Eurasian Partnership (GEP) has gained increasing currency in Russian foreign policy. The Russia–China partnership has been presented as its bedrock through a partnership between the Eurasian Economic Union and the Belt and Road Initiative, further expanding to include other regional powers from across East Asia, South Asia, Central Asia, and Middle East as well as nonwestern multilateral groupings (SCO, ASEAN). Given the centrality of Asia‐Pacific to this expansive concept, GEP has to deal with the challenges posed by the evolving regional geopolitics of the East and the rise of the Indo‐Pacific amidst heightened US–China rivalry. The paper seeks to conduct a policy review of GEP and its proposed development format in light of ongoing changes in the East to determine the likely future of the concept in a contested region that also remains at the center of this expansive Russian vision.

show abstract

Section: The Institutionalization Of Gep: What Stands In the Way Of I...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Wither the Greater Eurasian Partnership? Challenges from the East in an evolving world order

Kapoor

2024

Asian Politics and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Application of systems analysis for reconstruction of the model of cross-border resource flows and collaboration in R&D under the influence of sanctions

Никонова

2023

Mod. innov. razvit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: of the article is to form assessments based on system analysis to determine with whom Russia needs to interact in a situation of severe sanctions both in an open economy and whithin the framework of an open innovation model.Methods: the provisions of the system-economic paradigm and methods of an system analysis are applied to the economy, business, state, scientific, technical, infrastructural, social environment.Results: the results of a system analysis of the conditions and factors influencing the reconstruction of the model of cross-border resource flows and scientific and technical cooperation under the influence of sanctions are presented. The hypothesis is confirmed that the replacement of high-tech imports from the EU with supplies from China, India and other developing countries cannot be considered as a systemic solution in the long term, but can to a certain extent serve the Russia's technological security; maintain the stability of the production cycle in the Russian economy during fluctuations. This is illustrated by empirical evidence for the flow of energy resources and goods between countries and R&D collaboration. Arguments are given to substantiate the hypothesis about the strengthening of the influence of relationship factors, the interests of the parties, the human factor on the change in resource flows and the nature of scientific and technological cooperation due to the growing uncertainty of the situation. Variants of the influence of the relationship factor are considered from a systemic standpoint: on the one hand, as an adaptive, shaping factor of a turn towards Asian countries; on the other hand, as destructive, in which each of the parties pursues its own interests.Conclusions and Relevance: the results of the analysis confirm the relevance of the traditional recommendation to structurally and geographically diversify cross-border interactions based on the principle of a parity exchange of resources for advanced technologies and high-tech goods. The results of the analysis are consistent with the findings of leading scientists and experts in this field and can be used to make agile decisions about anti-crisis policy, national strategies, international interactions, and R&D collaboration.

show abstract

Economic Research Output among the Shanghai Cooperation Organizations (SCO) Countries - A Scientometric Analysis

P V,

Joy,

Jose

et al. 2024

RIEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the political and economic alliance of countries in the Eurasian region, has a significant role in the economic development of its member nations. This study examines the research performance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which was assessed using the cite space software, with all data retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database. A Total of 810 publications were taken from the Web of Science database for analysis. The study analysed the broad features of economic research output, focusing on Top cited institutions, different subject areas, top country-wise contributors, top authors, journals, etc. The study found that being an economic cooperation treaty like the Shanghai organization, the economic cooperation and economic research output were revealed and discussed for the first time in worldwide references. The analysis of citation counts highlights the dominance of Chinese institutions in terms of research impact. The Chinese Academy of Sciences stands out as the most cited institution, indicating its significant contribution to the economic research output among the SCO countries. The areas of interest within the economic research output of the SCO countries are environmental sciences and studies, followed by green and sustainable science and technology, public and occupational health, economics, and interdisciplinary mathematics applications. JEL Codes: F5, O5, O4 Received: 14/12/2023. Accepted: 26/05/2024. Published: 28/06/2024.

show abstract

The Results of the 20-Year Economic Cooperation of the shanghai Cooperation Organization and its Development Prospects

Cited by 5 publications

References 25 publications

Wither the Greater Eurasian Partnership? Challenges from the East in an evolving world order

Wither the Greater Eurasian Partnership? Challenges from the East in an evolving world order

Application of systems analysis for reconstruction of the model of cross-border resource flows and collaboration in R&D under the influence of sanctions

Economic Research Output among the Shanghai Cooperation Organizations (SCO) Countries - A Scientometric Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About