1959
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1959.tb01289.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Restricted Movement of Fish Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
206
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
16
206
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we cannot estimate maximum movement distances for our marked fish, our results do not support the long-held view of restricted fish movement first proposed by Gerking (1953Gerking ( , 1959. Since his seminal work, research on fish movement has overwhelmingly supported the idea that stream fishes are restricted to relatively small areas (see review by Gowan et al 1994).…”
Section: General Patterns Of Movementcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Although we cannot estimate maximum movement distances for our marked fish, our results do not support the long-held view of restricted fish movement first proposed by Gerking (1953Gerking ( , 1959. Since his seminal work, research on fish movement has overwhelmingly supported the idea that stream fishes are restricted to relatively small areas (see review by Gowan et al 1994).…”
Section: General Patterns Of Movementcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Previous studies in tropical streams (e.g. Mazzoni, Iglesias-Rios, 2012;Mazzoni et al, 2015) revealed that fishes move longer distances than that mentioned by Gerking (1959). Mazzoni, IglesiasRios (2012) registered fish movement in a tropical stream and suggested that they were mainly motivated by reproduction.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 77%
“…According to the Restricted Movement Paradigm postulated by Gerking (1959), adult stream-dwelling fishes have a restricted home range, so they are sedentary and spend their life at restricted stream reaches (20 -50 m). The scientific community accepted this idea and some studies corroborated it (e.g.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All species combined, as well as individual species, did not respond to such stressors as the stream channelization and climate changes at any significant level in the Dobrzynka Stream. This may be partly explained by the fact that dominant and subdominant species in the Dobrzynka Stream have calculated median displacement (MD) close or smaller than the home section lengths (HSL: 100 m, sensu Gerking, 1959), with exception of gibel on one sampling occasion. These results were congruent with estimated low turnover rate (TR) for the investigated species, which was significantly correlated with MD, and congruent with the Gerking's restricted movement paradigm (RMP), which was tested directly in this stream (Penczak, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%