2006
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of turbidity currents to a canyon–fan transition: internal hydraulic jumps and depositional signatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
188
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, numerical model developed by Kostic and Parker 14) has been applied to Monterey Submarine Channel off Monterey, California by Fildani, aided to conclude that the sediment waves on the outside levee of the Shepard bend appear to be net depositional cyclic steps 15) . Outcomes of this numerical study further concreted the idea that the sediment waves observed on the levees of many other submarine channels should probably be cyclic steps, perfectly agreeing with previuos research results 13),16), 17) . Numerical model proposed by Kostic and Parker based on "fourequation model" 18) , provided an insight into what can be expected once cyclic steps generated by turbidity currents in an experimental setting 19) .…”
Section: I_503supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Similarly, numerical model developed by Kostic and Parker 14) has been applied to Monterey Submarine Channel off Monterey, California by Fildani, aided to conclude that the sediment waves on the outside levee of the Shepard bend appear to be net depositional cyclic steps 15) . Outcomes of this numerical study further concreted the idea that the sediment waves observed on the levees of many other submarine channels should probably be cyclic steps, perfectly agreeing with previuos research results 13),16), 17) . Numerical model proposed by Kostic and Parker based on "fourequation model" 18) , provided an insight into what can be expected once cyclic steps generated by turbidity currents in an experimental setting 19) .…”
Section: I_503supporting
confidence: 64%
“…7 and 8), with mean paleoflow toward the northeast. Lenticular erosive features in the Baviaans area may represent either: shallow scours, often associated with channel-lobe transition zones (e.g., Wynn et al, 2002;Macdonald et al, 2011aMacdonald et al, , 2011bHofstra et al, 2015;Pemberton et al, 2016;Brooks et al, 2018b) formed by hydraulic jumps where flows transition from super-to subcritical due to a reduction in slope gradient and/or flow confinement (Mutti andNormark, 1987, 1991;Weirich, 1989;Kostic and Parker, 2006;Sumner et al, 2013;Dorrell et al, 2016); or weakly confined distributive channels eroding into proximal lobes, with distributive patterns likely due to the reduction of slope gradient (e.g., van der Werff and . These characteristics indicate deposition in a base-of-slope area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent flume and numerical models indicate that supercritical flows can produce upstream-migrating asymmetric bedforms with a wide range of scales (Figs. 5, 6;Sun and Parker 2005;Kostic and Parker 2006;Fildani et al 2006;Spinewine et al 2009;Cartigny et al 2011;Kostic 2011;). They provide a potential explanation for bedforms seen in fjord-head deltas (Figs.…”
Section: (B) Supercritical-flow Dynamics and Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%