The response of spring wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) to ozone at higher elevations

Fuhrer, Jürg; Grimm, Albert; Tschannen, W.; Shariatmadari, H.

doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01106.x

Cited by 76 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Carrasco-Rodriguez et al (2005) recorded an increase in fresh biomass and tuber numbers of potato after DPA was applied. Fuhrer et al (1992) (continued)…”

Section: The Chemistry Of O 3 Formation and Its Uptake And Fate In Pmentioning

confidence: 94%

Assessment of Ethylene Diurea-Induced Protection in Plants Against Ozone Phytotoxicity

Singh

Agrawal

et al. 2014

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 233

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urbanization, industrialization and unsustainable utilization of natural resources have made tropospheric ozone (03) one of the world's most significant air pollutants. Past studies reveal that 0 3 is a phytotoxic air pollutant that causes or enhances food insecurity across the globe. Plant sensitivity, tolerance and resistance to 0 3 involve a wide array of responses that range from growth to the physiological, biochemical and molecular. Although plants have an array of defense systems to combat oxidative stress from 0 3 exposure, they still suffer sizable yield reductions. In recent years, the ground-level 0 3 concentrations to which crop plants have been exposed have caused yield loses that are economically damaging. Several types of chemicals have been applied or used to mitigate the effects produced by 0 3 on plants. These include agrochemicals (fungicides, insecticides, plant growth regulators), natural antioxidants, and others. Such treatments have been effective to one degree to another, in ameliorating Or generated stress in plants. Ethylene diurea (EDU) has been the most effective protectant used and has also served as a monitoring agent for assessing plant yield losses from 0 3 exposure. In this review, we summarize the data on how EDU has been used, the treatment methods tested, and application doses found to be both protective and toxic in plants. We have also summarized data that address the nature and modes of action (biophysical and biochemical) of EDU. In general, the literature discloses that EDU is effective in reducing ozone damage to plants, and indicates that EDU should be more widely used on 0 3 sensitive plants as a tool for biomonitoring of 0 3 concentrations. Biomonitoring studies that utilize EDU are very useful for rural and remote areas and in developing countries where 0 3 monitoring is constrained from unavailability of electricity. The mechanism(s) by which EDU prevents 0 3 toxicity in plants is still not completely known. EDU possesses great utility for screening plant sensitivity under field conditions in areas that experience high 0 3 concentrations, because EDU prevents 0 3 toxicity only in 0 3 sensitive plants. Ozone-resistant plants do not respond positively to EDU applications. However, EDU application dose and frequency must be standardized before it can be effectively and widely used for screening 0 3 sensitivity in plants. EDU acts primarily by enhancing biochemical plant defense and delaying Or induced senescence, thereby reducing chlorophyll loss, and maintaining physiological efficiency and primary metabolites; these actions enhance growth, biomass and yield of plants. We believe that future studies are needed to better address the EDU dose response relationship for many plant species, and to screen for new cultivars that can resist 0 3 stress. Although some research on the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of action of EDU have been performed, the new 'omics' tools have not been utilized to evaluate EDUs mechanism of action. Such data are needed, as is gene exp...

show abstract

“…Carrasco-Rodriguez et al (2005) recorded an increase in fresh biomass and tuber numbers of potato after DPA was applied. Fuhrer et al (1992) (continued)…”

Section: The Chemistry Of O 3 Formation and Its Uptake And Fate In Pmentioning

confidence: 94%

Assessment of Ethylene Diurea-Induced Protection in Plants Against Ozone Phytotoxicity

Singh

Agrawal

et al. 2014

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 233

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, it was recognized, e.g. by Fuhrer et al (1992), that the impact on plants might be more closely related to the internal O 3 dose or the flux of O 3 through the stomata than to the exposure to high ambient O 3 mixing ratios. As the O 3 flux at RBJ was found to be reduced during periods of extreme O 3 mixing ratios (due to simultaneously occurring high specific humidity values), adverse consequences for the forest might be limited.…”

Section: Ozone Deposition Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seasonal variation of ozone deposition to a tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Within the project EUropean Studies on Trace gases and Atmospheric CHemistry as a contribution toLarge-scale Biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA-EUSTACH), we performed tower-based eddy covariance measurements of O 3 flux above an Amazonian primary rain forest at the end of the wet and dry season. Ozone deposition revealed distinct seasonal differences in the magnitude and diel variation. In the wet season, the rain forest was an effective O 3 sink with a mean daytime (midday) maximum deposition velocity of 2.3 cm s −1 , and a corresponding O 3 flux of −11 nmol m −2 s −1 . At the end of the dry season, the ozone mixing ratio was about four times higher (up to maximum values of 80 ppb) than in the wet season, as a consequence of strong regional biomass burning activity. However, the typical maximum daytime deposition flux was very similar to the wet season. This results from a strong limitation of daytime O 3 deposition due to reduced plant stomatal aperture as a response to large values of the specific humidity deficit. As a result, the average midday deposition velocity in the dry burning season was only 0.5 cm s −1 . The large diel ozone variation caused large canopy storage effects that masked the true diel variation of ozone deposition mechanisms in the measured eddy covariance flux, and for which corrections had to be made. In general, stomatal aperture was sufficient to explain the largest part of daytime ozone deposition. However, during nighttime, chemical reaction with nitrogen monoxide (NO) was found to contribute substantially to the O 3 sink in the rain forest canopy. Further contributions Correspondence to: U. Rummel (udo.rummel@dwd.de) were from non-stomatal plant uptake and other processes that could not be clearly identified.Measurements, made simultaneously on a 22 years old cattle pasture enabled the spatially and temporally direct comparison of O 3 dry deposition values from this site with typical vegetation cover of deforested land in southwest Amazonia to the results from the primary rain forest. The mean ozone deposition to the pasture was found to be systematically lower than that to the forest by 30% in the wet and 18% in the dry season.

show abstract

“…However, adverse effects of O $ on the quality of grain (Mulchi et al, 1986 ;Pleijel et al, 1991 ;Fuhrer et al, 1992 ;Rudorff et al, 1996), soybean (Mulchi et al, 1988), alfalfa (Thompson et al, 1976) and chipping potatoes (Pell et al, 1980) as well as the post-harvest storage properties of soft fruit and vegetables (Crisosto et al, 1993) have been documented. In the present study, ambient levels of O $ were found to cause a slight decrease in the SSC of harvested fruit (exposure to NFA resulted in a 4-8% decrease in ' Brix degree ' measurements).…”

Section: mentioning

confidence: 99%

Adverse effects of ambient ozone on watermelon yield and physiology at a rural site in Eastern Spain

et al. 1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study reported was conducted to establish the impacts of photochemical oxidants (primarily ambient ozone, O $ ) on the yield of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) at a site on the east coast of Spain. Fruit yield and quality were monitored in plots established in a commercial watermelon field exposed, in open-top chambers (OTCs), to nonfiltered air (NFA ; near-ambient levels of ozone) or charcoal-filtered air (decreased levels of photochemical oxidants including O $ ; CFA), or to ambient air (AA), during the 1988 and 1989 growing seasons. Ambient levels of O $ were found to exceed present UN-ECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe ; Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution) critical level guidelines for the protection of crop yield by approx. twofold in 1988 and by approx. fivefold in 1989. Plants exposed to NFA and AA developed visible O $ injury on the upper surface of sun-exposed older leaves, and fruit yield (annual marketable fruit weight and number) was found to be depressed in OTCs ventilated with NFA in comparison with those receiving CFA. Consistent with inter-annual variations in O $ exposure, greater yield losses were experienced in 1989 (39%) than in 1988 (19%), an effect mediated predominantly by a decline in fruit number rather than average fruit weight. Exposure to ambient levels of ozone also slightly decreased fruit quality (4-8% decline in soluble solids content). Leaf gas exchange measurements made in the field in 1988 revealed effects of O $ on fruit yield and quality to be associated with a decline in the net CO # assimilation rate per unit leaf area under light saturation (A sat ) and stomatal conductance to water vapour (g s ), and enhanced rates of dark respiration. A\c i curves (where A is the net CO # assimilation rate per unit leaf area and c i is the mole fraction of CO # in the leaf intercellular air space) constructed for plants grown in laboratory-based closed chambers, and exposed to an accumulated O $ exposure similar to that experienced by plants in the field, suggested that the likely cause of the decline in photosynthetic capacity was (1) a decrease in the amount and\or activity of Rubisco and (2) an impaired capacity for regeneration of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate, which was not mediated through changes in the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (F v \F m , where F v is variable chlorophyll a fluorescence and F m is maximum chlorophyll a fluorescence). No shift in the relative stomatal limitation to photosynthesis was observed under the influence of O $ , suggesting that the decline in g s induced by the pollutant in both field and laboratory was the result, and not the cause, of the decrease in A sat . Ozone exposure also caused a decrease in C isotope discrimination (approx. 0.5=), a shift that revealed a departure from predicted theory based on supporting leaf gas exchange measurements. The study demonstrates that ambient levels of photochemical oxidants on the Spanish Mediterranean coast are high enough to adversely influence the yield a...

show abstract

The response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to ozone at higher elevations

Cited by 76 publications

References 24 publications

Assessment of Ethylene Diurea-Induced Protection in Plants Against Ozone Phytotoxicity

Assessment of Ethylene Diurea-Induced Protection in Plants Against Ozone Phytotoxicity

Seasonal variation of ozone deposition to a tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia

Adverse effects of ambient ozone on watermelon yield and physiology at a rural site in Eastern Spain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About