2014
DOI: 10.1051/limn/2014005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of phytoplankton, zooplankton and macrozoobenthos communities to change in the water supply from surface to groundwater in aquaculture ponds

Abstract: -Investigating forces driving the structure of aquatic communities has long been an important issue in ecology. In the present study, we focused on the effects of changed water supply for aquaculture ponds on phytoplankton, zooplankton and macrozoobenthos communities during two seasons of rearing common carp. We compared these communities between two types of inflow water: surface sources of watera reservoir pond, two open wells and a small stream and groundwater -deep tube well. Significant changes were obser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established that agricultural activities have substantial effects on zooplankton species (i.e. decreases in species richness and biomass, imbalances in the hatching dynamics; Duli c et al 2014;Gutierrez et al 2017). So, changes in species composition are prone to happen between rice fields and natural wetlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that agricultural activities have substantial effects on zooplankton species (i.e. decreases in species richness and biomass, imbalances in the hatching dynamics; Duli c et al 2014;Gutierrez et al 2017). So, changes in species composition are prone to happen between rice fields and natural wetlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the biomass of Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanobacteria, Euglenophyta, and Pyrrophyta was 0.07-25.1 × 10 6 ind./L, 1.63-73.2 ind./L, 6.78-54.9 × 10 6 ind./ L, 1.53-11.8 × 10 6 ind./L, and 0.09-0.72 × 10 6 ind./L across seasons, with the relative contributions of 12.5%, 22.5%, 12.5%, 10%, and 2.5%, respectively [33,40].…”
Section: Phytoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the concentration of zooplankton (copepods, polychaetes, protozoans, barnacles, gastropods, ciliatea, hydrozoans, and others) ranged from 124 org/L to 309 org/L, where the copepods (83%) were the most abundant organisms in ponds with organic substrates and fertilization, followed by polychaetes (5%), barnacles (5%), protozoans (3%), ciliate (2%), gastropods (1%), and others (1%) [73]. In the ponds supplied with surface water/groundwater, the biomass of Rotatoria, Cladocera, and Copepoda across the seasons was 14.1-10466 ind./L, 1.7-691 ind./L, and 369-889 ind./L, respectively [40]. Furthermore, Rotifera and Cladocera sharply declined in biomass and abundance (66% of species disappeared) when the ponds changed from surface water to groundwater [40].…”
Section: Zooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small water bodies relatively quickly become silted and overgrown with vegetation and consequently disappear. These processes are caused both by natural (ecological succession and periodic rainfall deficiency) and anthropogenic factors (drainage works, cutting down trees and shrubs around water bodies, burning of shore vegetation, sewage discharge and waste storage; Céréghino et al 2008;Dulić et al 2014). Ponds have become more protected, particularly in the Mediterranean regions of Europe, following the recognition of Mediterranean temporary ponds as a priority in the EU (Céréghino et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%