2021
DOI: 10.5194/soil-2021-88
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of desert biocrust bacterial communities to hydration-desiccation cycles

Abstract: Abstract. Rain events in arid environments are highly unpredictable, interspersing extended periods of drought. Therefore, tracking changes in desert soil bacterial communities during hydration-desiccation cycles in the field, was seldom attempted. Here, we assessed rain-mediated dynamics of active community in the Negev Desert biological soil crust (biocrust), and evaluated the changes in bacterial composition, potential function, photosynthetic activity, and extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) production. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within days, changes in the labeled bacterial community composition and abundance were observed, indicating growth (Angel and Conrad, 2013). Similarly, biocrusts collected in the Negev Desert during a rain event and subsequent desiccation, demonstrated an increase in Cyanobacteria and decrease in Actinobacteria abundance (Baubin et al, 2021), implying selective proliferation of bacterial taxa in the hydrated biocrust. In other H2 18 O SIP assays on soil bacterial communities, a quick response to re-wetting was observed, and bacterial growth was evident within 24 to 72 hours of incubation (Blazewicz et al, 2014, Aanderud et al, 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Within days, changes in the labeled bacterial community composition and abundance were observed, indicating growth (Angel and Conrad, 2013). Similarly, biocrusts collected in the Negev Desert during a rain event and subsequent desiccation, demonstrated an increase in Cyanobacteria and decrease in Actinobacteria abundance (Baubin et al, 2021), implying selective proliferation of bacterial taxa in the hydrated biocrust. In other H2 18 O SIP assays on soil bacterial communities, a quick response to re-wetting was observed, and bacterial growth was evident within 24 to 72 hours of incubation (Blazewicz et al, 2014, Aanderud et al, 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To overcome environmental limitations biocrust organisms have developed several strategies such as extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that help them to retain water (Mugnai et al, 2018), UV-protecting pigments such as scytonemin (Miralles et al, 2017) or specific compounds including sucrose and trehalose (Xin et al, 2015;Baubin et al, 2021) that minimize metabolic desiccation stress. Most of these strategies have not yet been fully explored, and a plethora of novel genes and metabolites is expected from biocrust-forming microorganisms from extreme environments which can be used to obtain a wide variety of products using biotechnological processes (Lakatos and Strieht, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%