2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of benthic foraminifera to aquaculture and industrial pollution: A case study from the Northern Persian Gulf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heavy metals are accumulated in benthic sediments, where they are incorporated into several biological and chemical cycles [50]. High concentrations of zinc, copper, or other metal elements are toxic to macrobenthic fauna and microalgae, which are crucial elements in the food-chain for natural fisheries production [51]. Moreover, the residues of medicines, antibiotics, and vaccines found in the effluent are common sources of anthropogenic chemical pollution derived from mariculture operations [52].…”
Section: Organic Matter and Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy metals are accumulated in benthic sediments, where they are incorporated into several biological and chemical cycles [50]. High concentrations of zinc, copper, or other metal elements are toxic to macrobenthic fauna and microalgae, which are crucial elements in the food-chain for natural fisheries production [51]. Moreover, the residues of medicines, antibiotics, and vaccines found in the effluent are common sources of anthropogenic chemical pollution derived from mariculture operations [52].…”
Section: Organic Matter and Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FI assesses the relative proportions of LBF against two categories of SBF, small heterotrophic species and opportunistic species (Hallock et al 2003). An FI = 4 implies 25% of the assemblage is LBF and FI > 4 indicates water quality that is suitable for coral growth; FI < 2 is unsuitable and between these two ranges the environment is marginal for coral growth (Hallock et al 2003) Low or declining FIs and/or densities of Foraminifera accompanied by changes in assemblages have been reported in reefs near urbanised and heavily populated sites around the world, including nearshore sites on the GBR and in Moreton Bay reflecting poor water quality (Schueth and Frank 2008;Uthicke and Nobes 2008;Fujita et al 2009;Narayan and Pandolfi 2010;Osawa et al 2010;Uthicke et al 2010;Fabricius et al 2012;Parsaian et al 2018). Changes in Foraminifera assemblages have also been demonstrated over short time periods.…”
Section: Foraminiferamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of these microorganisms is conditioned by diverse physical-chemical parameters of the waters (salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH), as well as by the characteristics of the substrate where they live (granulometry, geochemistry) [1][2][3]. Its abundance and diversity can be altered by changes in the dynamics of the environment, erosion of the bottom or anthropic contamination, among other factors [4,5]. In southwestern Spain, several studies have analyzed the spatial distribution of benthic foraminifera in the different sedimentary environments of three estuaries (Guadiana, Piedras and Tinto-Odiel) [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%