2016
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2016.1160070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Resource Curse - What Have We Learned from Two Decades of Intensive Research: Introduction to the Special Issue

Abstract: There has been increasing interest in the so-called 'resource curse', i.e. the tendency of resourcerich countries to underperform in several development outcomes. This has generated a mountain of (often contradictory) evidence leaving many floundering in the flood of information. The special issue compiles eight papers from some of the most prominent contributors to this literature, combining original research with critical reflection on the current stock of knowledge. The studies collectively emphasize the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of natural resources on the volatility of economic growth is a well-established fact (for instance, see Arezki, Patillo, Quintyn, & Zhu, 2012;Davis, 2013;Papyrakis, 2017;Sachs & Warner, 2001;van der Ploeg & Poelhekke, 2017). Many observations point to a strong relationship between growth volatility and vulnerability to shocks (Collier & Venables, 2008;Ehrhart & Guerineau, 2013;Frankel, 2010;Humphreys, Sachs, & Stiglitz, 2007;Ross, 2012b;van der Ploeg & Poelhekke, 2008;van der Ploeg & Venables, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of natural resources on the volatility of economic growth is a well-established fact (for instance, see Arezki, Patillo, Quintyn, & Zhu, 2012;Davis, 2013;Papyrakis, 2017;Sachs & Warner, 2001;van der Ploeg & Poelhekke, 2017). Many observations point to a strong relationship between growth volatility and vulnerability to shocks (Collier & Venables, 2008;Ehrhart & Guerineau, 2013;Frankel, 2010;Humphreys, Sachs, & Stiglitz, 2007;Ross, 2012b;van der Ploeg & Poelhekke, 2008;van der Ploeg & Venables, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of natural resources on the volatility of economic growth is a well-established fact (for instance, see Arezki et al 2012;Papyrakis 2016;van der Ploeg and Poelhekke 2016). Many observations point to a strong relationship between volatility and vulnerability to shocks (Collier and Venables 2008;Ehrhart and Guerineau 2013;Frankel 2010;Humphreys et al 2007;Ross 2012b;van der Ploeg and Poelhekke 2008;van der Ploeg and Venables 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Ploeg and Poelhekke (2010;2016) argue that using resource intensity as an explanatory variable suffers from endogeneity issues and measures the dependency on resources instead of the abundance from the same. They found no evidence of adverse growth effects if natural wealth is estimated with the not yet extracted reserves per capita.…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Davis, 2013) Academic interest is still on the rise as recent events like the Arab Spring or the crisis in Venezuela are principally explained in the context of the resource curse. (Papyrakis, 2016) First attempts of theoretical understanding were based on the Dutch disease model originally developed by Corden and Neary (1982), in which the resource-driven growth generates losses in international competitiveness and leads to a less diverse and vulnerable economy. In this framework the booming extractive sector distracts resources from manufacturing and boosts the demand for domestic services causing direct and indirect de-industrialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%