1976
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90122-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The resistances of Micrococcus radiodurans to killing and mutation by agents which damage DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6A). In contrast, the degrees of resistance of wild-type and complemented mutant strains to UV and mitomycin were undistinguishable and comparable to those previously reported for E. coli (42), taking the low growth rate of M. dichloromethanicum into account (doubling time of about 3.6 h with MeOH at 30°C [ Table 1]). Most notably, the polA mutant from strain DM4 was also sensitive to treatment with DCM (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…6A). In contrast, the degrees of resistance of wild-type and complemented mutant strains to UV and mitomycin were undistinguishable and comparable to those previously reported for E. coli (42), taking the low growth rate of M. dichloromethanicum into account (doubling time of about 3.6 h with MeOH at 30°C [ Table 1]). Most notably, the polA mutant from strain DM4 was also sensitive to treatment with DCM (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, survivors of extreme ionizing radiation, UV, or bulky chemical-adduct exposures do not show any mutagenesis greater than that occurring after a single round of normal replication (197,198). On the other hand, D. radiodurans is mutable by N-methyl-NЈ-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine and other agents that can cause mispairing of bases during replication (197,198). Of the many forms of damage imposed on DNA by ionizing radiation, DSBs are considered the most lethal due to the inherent difficulty in their repair, since no single-strand template for accurate repair remains in the double helix (117).…”
Section: Dna Damage Resistancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Compared to other organisms, the D. radiodurans DNA sustains the expected amount of damage in vivo at high irradiation doses, on the order of 150 to 200 double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) at 1.5 megarads per haploid chromosome under aerobic irradiation conditions, all of which are mended within hours following irradiation (53,107,123), nor is its DNA less susceptible than that of E. coli to UV in vivo (183). Furthermore, survivors of extreme ionizing radiation, UV, or bulky chemical-adduct exposures do not show any mutagenesis greater than that occurring after a single round of normal replication (197,198). On the other hand, D. radiodurans is mutable by N-methyl-NЈ-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine and other agents that can cause mispairing of bases during replication (197,198).…”
Section: Dna Damage Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dose of 6 kGy induces approximately 200 DSBs (79), over 3,000 SSBs (65,79), and many more sites of base damage per D. radiodurans genome (236). D. radiodurans survives 5 kGy of ionizing radiation without lethality or mutagenesis (135,161,597) (Fig. 3A).…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation Resistance Of D Radioduransmentioning
confidence: 99%