2003
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200311000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The resistance of maxillofacial reconstruction plates to biofilm formation in vitro

Abstract: The absence of biofilm formation on these implants can best be explained by the surface charge or polarity properties of these materials. These findings are consistent with the relatively low incidence of infections among patients receiving these implants in maxillofacial applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro results have reported that bacterial cells exhibit reduced adhesion to titanium and resorbable polylactide plates, which is attributed to the surface charge and smoothness. 154 This reduced adhesion is also consistent with the reduced incidence of infection in case of patients who received implants made of these materials.…”
Section: Substrate Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In vitro results have reported that bacterial cells exhibit reduced adhesion to titanium and resorbable polylactide plates, which is attributed to the surface charge and smoothness. 154 This reduced adhesion is also consistent with the reduced incidence of infection in case of patients who received implants made of these materials.…”
Section: Substrate Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The chemical composition of the substratum plays an important role in bacterial adhesion to medical devices [2]. The physical properties of the biomaterial surface, such as roughness, hydrophobicity, surface energy, and electrostatic charge, also affect this process, especially in metallic materials [3,4]. Inorganic material surfaces are hydrophilic, display high surface energy, and frequently carry negative charge, whereas polymers such as ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are considered to be hydrophobic, with low surface energy and low electrostatic charge [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%