The Resilience of the Nation Sate:Cosmopolitanism, Holocaust Memory and German Identity

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to offer a critique of the proposal of “methodological cosmopolitanism“ in theoretical terms and to substantiate this critique by providing an account of the dynamics of collective memory and identity in postunification Germany. In the first part, we look at the arguments about methodological cosmopolitanism and their derivative, the idea of cosmopolitan memory, illustrated by the case of Holocaust memory. In the second part we look at the case of Germany: firstly at its postwar experience of the attempted construction of “postnational“ identity, and then at more recent trends, contemporaneous with the Berlin Republic, towards a “normalization“ of national identity in Germany. The Holocaust plays a crucial, but different, role in each phase, we suggest. In the conclusion we return to more general themes, asking what the German case tells us about the cosmopolitanization thesis more generally.

Erasing and dehumanizing Natives to protect positive national identity: The Native mascot example

“…Next, non-Natives must seek more accurate, expansive narratives that reflect who Native Peoples are and how they want to be seen (i.e., learn the truth about Natives' historical and contemporary experiences). Finally, instead of building a positive national identity by suppressing national transgressions, positive national identity must be fostered by acknowledging the past and highlighting the nation's continued commitment to building a more just and moral future in line with our ideals (e.g., see: Dresler-Hawke & Liu, 2006;Levy, 1999;Welch & Wittlinger, 2011). By following these recommendations, non-Natives may be better able to identify and replace erasing and dehumanizing narratives of Natives.…”

Cultural Diplomacy in the War Museum: The Case of the German-Russian Museum Berlin-Karlshorst

“…While "defining the current community in opposition to the past," 46 it can be argued that this ostensibly post-national approach also makes possible a positive national identification or even self-confidence, 47 in that Germany can present itself as the country that has learned the lessons of the age of the twentieth century and overcome the dangers associated with nationalist and anti-democratic ideologies. 48 In this way, German political elites balance the need to acknowledge the crimes of National Socialism with the need for ontological security founded in a fundamentally positive biographical narrative. This dominant memory regime in the German context is reflected in the authorized heritage discourse, subscribed to by the mainstream of heritage professionals and historians concerned with the communication of history to the public.…”

Rethinking empathy: Emotions triggered by the Holocaust among the Muslim-minority in Germany

“…Hence, it is sensitive about victimhood claims by any group other than Holocaust victims (von Bieberstein, 2016). Simultaneously, since unification the Holocaust is shifting from a burden of debilitating shame to proof of German responsibility (Markovits, 2006; Welch and Wittlinger, 2011). Germany’s ability to confront its dark past is increasingly seen as a sign of special moral qualifications that legitimize its appearance on the world stage again (Frochtner, 2014).…”