The Resilience of Cardiac Care Through Virtualized Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Study of a Heart Function Clinic

Abstract

Background: Virtual care has historically faced barriers to widespread adoption. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the rapid adoption and expansion of virtual care technologies. Although the intense and prolonged nature of the COVID-19 pandemic has renewed people's interest in health systems resilience, which includes how services adapt or transform in response to shocks, evidence regarding the role of virtual care technologies in health systems resilience is scarce.Objective: At Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada, the rapid virtualization of cardiac care began on March 9, 2020, as a response to the pandemic. The objective of this study was to understand people's experiences with and the barriers and facilitators of the rapid virtualization and expansion of cardiac care resulting from the pandemic.Methods: A single-case study was conducted with 3 embedded units of analysis. Patients, clinicians, and staff were recruited purposively from an existing mobile, phone-based telemonitoring program at a heart function clinic in Toronto, Canada. Individual, semistructured phone interviews were conducted by two researchers and transcribed verbatim. An inductive thematic analysis at the semantic level was used to analyze transcripts and develop themes.Results: A total of 29 participants were interviewed, including patients (n=16), clinicians (n=9), and staff (n=4). The following five themes were identified: (1) patient safety as a catalyst for virtual care adoption; (2) piecemeal virtual care solutions; (3) confronting new roles and workloads; (4) missing pieces in virtual care; and (5) the inequity paradox. The motivation to protect patient safety and a piecemeal approach to virtual care adoption facilitated the absorptive and adaptive resilience of cardiac care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, ad hoc changes to clinic roles and workflows, challenges in building relationships through remote methods, and widened inequities were barriers that threatened virtual care sustainment. Conclusions:We contend that sustaining virtual care hinges upon transformative actions (rather than adaptive actions) that strengthen health systems so that they can face the dynamic and emergent challenges associated with COVID-19 and other shocks.

The rise of resilient healthcare research during COVID-19: scoping review of empirical research

“…For example, Gifford et al [ 66 ] reported the way in which wards and outpatient clinics rapidly converted to “digital” wards involving e-health, video and phone consultations. Alternatively, in one study from Canada [ 68 ], a lack of appropriate technology impeded resilient performance, with the rapid but “piecemeal” adoption of multiple virtual care technologies during COVID-19 resulting in systems that duplicated administrative work for healthcare professionals.…”

Resilience perspective on healthcare professionals’ adaptations to changes and challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-synthesis

“…Several studies highlighted a spike in the use of different technologies to enable the provision of patient care in different settings 38 45 53 54 57 58 68 71 74–77. Dunleavy and colleagues54 described the adoption of new technology to manage diabetes care during the pandemic such as the use of web-linked glucometers, electronic patient records, online referral systems and videoconferencing tools.…”

Lessons Learned from the Lessons Learned in Public Health during the First Years of COVID-19 Pandemic

“…A total of 10 lessons, derived from 61 studies [7,8,[10][11][12][14][15][16][17]19,20,23,25,28,30,33,39,43,45,[48][49][50][51]54,55,57,58,60,63,65,67,[71][72][73]78,82,83,85,91,96,101,116,118,[121][122][123]129,131,[136][137][138][140]…”