2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10040-008-0136-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Researches of Effectiveness of Road Restraint Systems

Abstract: The work describes model and experimental tests on the road restraint systems with particular attention to vehicle collisions with a concrete protective barrier. Vehicle and protective barrier crash tests include the experiment results in three basic fields: intensity of influence of the collision effects on vehicle passengers, collision impact on a vehicle and the road restraint system. It presents a test track concept as well as criteria for performing and evaluating the crash tests with a passenger vehicle … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Borovinsek et al [20], in their studies investigating the reliability of FE simulations for roadside safety, error values of less than 8% were obtained between FE simulation values and real collision values, and it was argued that FE simulations could be used in this sense. Borkowski et al [21] compared the TB11 test with the real crash test and LS-DYNA FE simulation according to some criteria within the scope of EN 1317 standard and emphasized that the LS-DYNA FE model can be used. Niezgoda et al [22] in their studies on the use of computer-assisted software in modeling and simulation of crash tests, it was recommended that numerical and experimental tests largely confirm each other, and the use of computer-aided software in crash tests would be convenient.…”
Section: Figure 1 -(A) Concrete Barriers (Rigid) (B) Steel Guardrails...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borovinsek et al [20], in their studies investigating the reliability of FE simulations for roadside safety, error values of less than 8% were obtained between FE simulation values and real collision values, and it was argued that FE simulations could be used in this sense. Borkowski et al [21] compared the TB11 test with the real crash test and LS-DYNA FE simulation according to some criteria within the scope of EN 1317 standard and emphasized that the LS-DYNA FE model can be used. Niezgoda et al [22] in their studies on the use of computer-assisted software in modeling and simulation of crash tests, it was recommended that numerical and experimental tests largely confirm each other, and the use of computer-aided software in crash tests would be convenient.…”
Section: Figure 1 -(A) Concrete Barriers (Rigid) (B) Steel Guardrails...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations were carried out using finite element code with explicit time integration. This method is widely used in modelling vehicle collision against various types of road restrained systems [11][12][13][14]. Validation procedures have been described in European Standards [3,4], their direct use can be found in [15,16].…”
Section: Crash Test Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to prove the capability of a computer system to simulate full-scale crash tests on road safety barriers. Borkowski et al 10,11 presented the results of simulation crash tests on a concrete barrier based on European standard EN 1317 and proved the possibility of using simulation methods for analyzing and evaluating road safety barriers. Atahan 12 used the numerical method to demonstrate how simulations could replace experimental tests for a strong-post W-beam guardrail system.…”
Section: Figure 1 Presents Some Images Of Roadside Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%