The “Research Audit” Model: A Prototype for Data-Driven Discovery of Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research

Burnette, Margaret (Peg) H.

doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0052

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Braun (72) noted a new collaboration that developed across campus through this initiative between information technology staff, medical school administrators, and liaison librarians. Burnette (74) provided an overview of a research audit of their institution and the subsequent building of a database to track their researchers' publications. Two reports (34, 59) focused on research impact services provided by librarians embedded in research departments.…”

Section: Research Metrics (N=15)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These lessrepresented services ranged from sitting on ethics review boards (40,77), research committees (40,(78)(79)(80) or Animal Care and Use committees (81), to serving as full members of research teams (29,31,(35)(36)(37)(38)59), offering copyright-related services (82) or consent form and research protocol assistance (83). Reported services also included the creation of tools, portals, or taxonomies (35,37,67,78,84,85), providing non-systematic review search support (2,69,78,81,86,87), creating new library spaces for researchers (88), providing training in various topics of relevance along the research lifecycle (31, 64, 67-69, 78, 82, 83, 85, 87, 89-91), or leading communitybuilding activities such as forming groups or hubs to connect researchers with potential collaborators (26,69,74,(91)(92)(93).…”

Section: Other Services (N=35)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Research Support in Health Sciences Libraries: A Scoping Review

Visintini¹,

Boutet

Manley³

et al. 2018

J Can Health Libr Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:As part of a health sciences library’s internal assessment of its research support services, an environmental scan and literature review were conducted to identify research services offered elsewhere in Canada. Through this process, it became clear that a more formal review of the academic literature would help libraries make informed decisions about their services. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of research services provided in health sciences libraries contexts.Methods:Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL, LISTA, LISS, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Google for articles which described the development, implementation, or evaluation of one or more research support initiatives in a health sciences library context. We identified additional articles by searching reference lists of included studies and soliciting medical library listservs.Results:Our database searches retrieved 7134 records, 4026 after duplicates were removed. Title/abstract screening excluded 3751, with 333 records retained for full-text screening. Seventy-five records were included, reporting on 74 different initiatives. Included studies were published between 1990 and 2017, the majority from North American and academic library contexts. Major service areas reported were the creation of new research support positions, and support services for systematic review support, grants, data management, open access and repositories.Conclusion:This scoping review is the first review to our knowledge to map research support services in the health sciences library context. It identified main areas of research service support provided by health sciences libraries that can be used for benchmarking or information gathering purposes.

show abstract

Section: Research Metrics (N=15)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Other Services (N=35)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Support in Health Sciences Libraries: A Scoping Review

Visintini¹,

Boutet

Manley³

et al. 2018

J Can Health Libr Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Web of Science has set standards for preparing a manuscript and adopting the citations method for the journals indexed by Clarivate. In addition to adopting one method for citations (Burnette, 2015), these standards are also included in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (Hunsley, 2010).…”

Section: Journals Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating quality of Arab journals of special education

Al-Zoubi

2022

CJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quality of the research can be measured by a set of standards and indicators that focus on the idea of research originality, the depth of discussion, the literature analysis techniques, and the quality of research instruments. This research aims to evaluate the quality of Arab journals of special education (AJSEs). Five AJSEs were evaluated, all specializing in special education in the Arab world. The AJSEs were issued in Egypt, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. A checklist of 20 indicators was developed and applied to these journals. Results revealed that 5 indicators were highly met, 11 indicators were moderately met, and 4 indicators were low met in AJSEs. The results also indicated a difference in the quality indicators achievability (QIA) according to the journal's name. The QIA in International Journal for Talent Development, and Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation was considerable. While, the QIA of the Saudi Journal of Special Education and Arab Journal of Disability and Talent Sciences was moderate, and it was low in Journal of Special Education. Keywords: Arab journals of special education, indicators, quality, scientific publishing, special education

show abstract

“…Besides, he faces other problems like preventing him from applying for publication for several years at his university and the misuse of his credit card data either in purchases he does not know about or in prohibited activities that expose him to criminal accountability in some cases. Hence, (Burnette, 2015). The two researchers agreed to study this phenomenon in its two parts:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Publishing in hijacked Web of Science journals: Analytical and legal study

Alhawawsheh¹,

Sawy²

2022

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed at a legal and scientific analysis of the plagiarized journals within the Web of Science system, in a time when the phenomenon of plagiarism and piracy spread to the titles of scientific and humanities magazines. Researchers sought to analyze the concept of plagiarism of international scientific journals based on its definition in scientific publishing, its dimensions and danger at the academic level of the researcher, and the academic and institutional level of the university. It also analyzed the types of plagiarism that include cloning, copying, substitution, mixing, and repetition as well as the scientific publishing of forged magazines that are no less dangerous and effective than the spoofed magazines. The study obtained several results, the most important of which is the risk for researchers to lose academic promotion and face direct penalties that hinder their path when appropriating funds through unaccredited scientific publications. The study has also reached specific criteria that the researcher must adhere to when seeking publication, the most important of which is the use of accredited websites of scientific journals and international publishers.

show abstract

The “Research Audit” Model: A Prototype for Data-Driven Discovery of Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research

Cited by 7 publications

References 13 publications

Research Support in Health Sciences Libraries: A Scoping Review

Research Support in Health Sciences Libraries: A Scoping Review

Evaluating quality of Arab journals of special education

Publishing in hijacked Web of Science journals: Analytical and legal study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About