2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2339-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The required minimum length of video sequences for obtaining a reliable interobserver diagnosis in wrist arthroscopies

Abstract: Diagnostic II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If necessary, additional instruments were inserted, for example to execute the push-off needle test [27]. As recommended by Löw et al, adequate photo and video documentation of arthrographies was performed to enhance intra-and interobserver reliability [28,29]. In the remaining 84 patients, no surgical exploration was realized based on wrist stability in clinical assessment and imaging results.…”
Section: Reference Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If necessary, additional instruments were inserted, for example to execute the push-off needle test [27]. As recommended by Löw et al, adequate photo and video documentation of arthrographies was performed to enhance intra-and interobserver reliability [28,29]. In the remaining 84 patients, no surgical exploration was realized based on wrist stability in clinical assessment and imaging results.…”
Section: Reference Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cartilage assessment already differs among surgeons, when they scope the same patients one-by-one, 1 the quality of assessment diminishes further by inadequate documentation. Löw et al 6 have examined the interobserver diagnoses based on video documents of different lengths. In their study, surgeons rated twice as many false-positive cartilage lesions when viewing short videos compared with when viewing long video sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 On the other hand, insufficient photo or video documentation impedes others from reproducing what was diagnosed during arthroscopy. [3][4][5][6] Therefore, for those who perform definitive treatment, repeat arthroscopy serves to get an own idea of the wrists' status. Studies reporting on the incidence and causes for revision arthroscopies in larger joints are numerous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Arthro-scopy was performed in a standardized fashion with the wrists thoroughly examined and documented as has been described in the literature. 3,10 If arthroscopy revealed a central TFC perforation (►Fig. 1), the lesions' margins were first resected by the use of a punch (►Video 1) and then debrided using an oscillating shaver (►Video 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%