1991
DOI: 10.2307/3679029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reputation of Robert Cecil: Libels, Political Opinion and Popular Awareness in the Early Seventeenth Century

Abstract: On 29 April 1612 the London letter writer John Chamberlain penned another of his regular epistles to his friend Sir Dudley Carleton, ambassador in Venice. For weeks a chief news item had been the declining health of the Lord Treasurer, Robert Cecil Earl of Salisbury. ‘I wish I could send you better assurance’ Chamberlain wrote, ‘but as far as I can learn there is more cause of fear than hope’. Salisbury was journeying to Bath, where he had often sought relief before, but he had been ‘very yll by the way yester… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…94 Contemporaries were often not kind to those with physical disabilities-for instance Sir Robert Cecil, secretary of state and sometime ambassador, was ridiculed for his hunched back, which his detractors linked to moral and political failings. 95 Meanwhile, Gentili both followed ancient authors in praising beauty and professed that he would not 'say what measure of good looks I demand in a man and in an ambassador', just that he should be 'of good personal appearance'. He did, however, agree with Thynne on the question of height, noting that it helped if ambassadors had, like Jerome Bowes, whom Elizabeth had sent to Muscovy, 'a tall and distinguished figure' that gave 'an immediate impression of both vigor and courtesy'.…”
Section: The Perfect Ambassador and Early Modern Manhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 Contemporaries were often not kind to those with physical disabilities-for instance Sir Robert Cecil, secretary of state and sometime ambassador, was ridiculed for his hunched back, which his detractors linked to moral and political failings. 95 Meanwhile, Gentili both followed ancient authors in praising beauty and professed that he would not 'say what measure of good looks I demand in a man and in an ambassador', just that he should be 'of good personal appearance'. He did, however, agree with Thynne on the question of height, noting that it helped if ambassadors had, like Jerome Bowes, whom Elizabeth had sent to Muscovy, 'a tall and distinguished figure' that gave 'an immediate impression of both vigor and courtesy'.…”
Section: The Perfect Ambassador and Early Modern Manhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Some of the most interesting and persuasive work in this vein concerned libels, a politically transgressive form associated with manuscript culture, in which could be found considerable evidence of conflict and political opposition, long before the civil war broke out. 5 An interest in opposition sentiment led to questions not only about its articulation but also about its reception, about the transmission and reading of politics and news. In retrospect, matters of public opinion seem an integral component of the post-revisionist repudiation of revisionist localism.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…© Blackwell Publishing 2004History Compass 2 (2004) BI 123,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Seventeenth-Century Print Culture 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20.Croft 1991, 63: Northampton usually described Salisbury as the ‘little lord’, or ‘little man’, which once became ‘the little one itself’ (TNA, SP14/71/16). Following Cecil’s death in 1612, he wrote to Viscount Rochester remarking that ‘so many rejoice, and so few seem to be sorry […] Is near his mistress [Elizabeth I], and wishes Rochester as near his, if any one can love so ugly and deformed a fellow’ ( Cal State P Dom 1611–18, 26 May 1612, 133).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%