2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The representative sample size in shale oil rocks and nano-scale characterization of transport properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In multi-scale studies of shales, how features of interest are identified and quantified is important. Of particular importance is the prediction and modelling of petrophysical properties including permeability, diffusion, deformation and electrical conductivity (Mishra and Akbar 2011;Yoon and Dewers 2013;Saraji and Piri 2015). The acquisition of representative data in very heterogeneous materials is a fundamental problem in shale characterisation.…”
Section: Representative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In multi-scale studies of shales, how features of interest are identified and quantified is important. Of particular importance is the prediction and modelling of petrophysical properties including permeability, diffusion, deformation and electrical conductivity (Mishra and Akbar 2011;Yoon and Dewers 2013;Saraji and Piri 2015). The acquisition of representative data in very heterogeneous materials is a fundamental problem in shale characterisation.…”
Section: Representative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saraji et al . [ 17 ] reported that the average pore radius of several reservoir samples from Bakken formation is within the 5–100 nm range. The characteristics of nanoscale porosity and complicated interfaces of the oil reservoirs result in a considerable amount of petroleum hydrocarbons confined in intricate microscale or nanoscale pores [ 18 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the application of µ-CT in the geosciences was previously introduced by Ketcham and Carlson (2001) and Ketcham (2005), many investigations that analyze irregular particle shapes are still performed with 2-D approaches (Buller et al, 1990;Zhang et al, 2016;Petrak et al, 2015). So far, µ-CT studies of 3-D features have mostly been related to the characterization of volcanic rocks (Eiríksson et al, 1994;Riley et al, 2003;Shea et al, 2010;Vonlanthen et al, 2015) or spheroidal objects (Robin and Charles, 2015), and these features are usually described by means of equivalent size or shape parameters, such as roundness or aspect ratio (Little et al, 2015;Saraji and Piri, 2015). Nevertheless, these intuitive descriptors provide more qualitative denotation and might obscure information regarding the original particle shape.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%