1980
DOI: 10.1016/0143-148x(80)90017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The replacement of the nondescript term ‘heavy metals’ by a biologically and chemically significant classification of metal ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
506
0
13

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,051 publications
(534 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
15
506
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The toxic effect of heavy metals, both essential and non-essential, depends on the type of target organism, the conditions of intake, the availability and concentration of the heavy metal and the kinetics of uptake, while the mechanisms of heavy-metal ion toxicity include the blocking of the functional group of biomolecules, displacing the essential metal ion in biomolecules, and modification of the active conformation of biomolecules (22). Heavy metals may affect cellular oxidation state, lipid peroxidation, breaking of DNA strands, protein expression and folding, degradation in proteasome, protein interactions, cell cycle and apoptosis; they are persistent and toxic, and they accumulate through the food chain (17,(23)(24)(25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxic effect of heavy metals, both essential and non-essential, depends on the type of target organism, the conditions of intake, the availability and concentration of the heavy metal and the kinetics of uptake, while the mechanisms of heavy-metal ion toxicity include the blocking of the functional group of biomolecules, displacing the essential metal ion in biomolecules, and modification of the active conformation of biomolecules (22). Heavy metals may affect cellular oxidation state, lipid peroxidation, breaking of DNA strands, protein expression and folding, degradation in proteasome, protein interactions, cell cycle and apoptosis; they are persistent and toxic, and they accumulate through the food chain (17,(23)(24)(25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the K^ value obtained in Figure 6 a for extracellular Cd uptake in the absence of K was less than that obtained in Figure 7 b suggests that one of the Cdbinding sites in R. squarrosus has an affinity much higher than that suggested by the K^ value of 26 /IM. It is probable that this reflects in part the higher affinity of Cd for sulphydryl over carboxyl groups in the extracellular matrix (Nieboer & Richardson, 1980). The results imply that Cd and K display mutually exclusive binding to one exchange site and that binding of K to a different site reduces the number of functional Cd binding sites.…”
Section: K Interaction With CD Uptakementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Kinetic constants for intra-and extracellular Cd uptake were determined using procedures outlined by Wells & Brown (1987) (Nieboer & Richardson, 1980), we have shown that incubation in Cd solutions of 200 fiM or less for up to 30 min does not affect COg exchange or intracellular K concentrations in JR. squarrosus (Wells & Brown, 1987;Brown & Wells, 1990). ] Intracellular Cd uptake rates were determined by regression of Cd uptake against time for each concentration used.…”
Section: Determination Of Kinetic Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The borderline class: Zn, Pb, iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), Ni, As, vanadium (V), and tin (Sn) [127].…”
Section: Heavy Metals and Metalloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%