2009
DOI: 10.1080/01421590903141082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The replacement of ‘paper’ cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning

Abstract: St George's University of London (SGUL) has a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) curriculum for its undergraduate medicine course, using traditional paper-based patient cases. To counter the limitation that paper cases are linear and do not allow students to explore the consequences of decisions, interactive online virtual patients (VPs) were developed which allowed students to consider options as the cases unfold, and allow students to explore the consequences of their actions. A PBL module was converted to VPs, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
74
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
74
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because when using problem-based learning in virtual learning environments the discussion forums result in a linearity in learning which is unhelpful for team work. Using problem-based learning in SL student experience suggests both in this study and other related PREVIEW studies [3][4][5][6][7] , that students value in-world interactive collaboration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because when using problem-based learning in virtual learning environments the discussion forums result in a linearity in learning which is unhelpful for team work. Using problem-based learning in SL student experience suggests both in this study and other related PREVIEW studies [3][4][5][6][7] , that students value in-world interactive collaboration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further related papers were published elsewhere. [3][4][5][6][7] It is argued here that the current lack of pedagogical underpinning has introduced a number of difficulties, little understanding about which kinds of pedagogies best work in virtual worlds and which do not and what the impact is of using these 3D spaces on student learning and student engagement. It is suggested here that these difficulties might be overcome by using approaches that readily combine pedagogy with technology, thereby shifting from the VLEs to IVWs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, students showed positive perceptions of the interactive multimedia format for case presentation. Although research indicates students prefer computer-simulated health care problems (Cunningham et al 2006) and that interactive multimedia cases enhance student engagement in learning (Kamin et al 2002;de Leng et al 2006;de Leng et al 2007;Poulton et al 2009;Chan et al 2010), most of these studies used a video format and there has been scant research on other formats. This study explores another design approach for case presentation that can be adapted from paper cases relatively easily and can be used in a variety of PBL settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e-PBL enhances flexibility for learning, which offers students opportunities to learn anytime and anywhere and provides them with more choices regarding what, when, and how they learn (Valaitis et al 2005;SavinBaden 2007). Additionally, the presentation of PBL cases using interactive multimedia can enhance the authenticity of the case, and engage the student more deeply in learning than when presented in a paper patient format (Kamin et al 2002;de Leng et al 2006;Bizzocchi & Schell 2009;Poulton et al 2009;Chan et al 2010). Furthermore, students can take advantage of easy access to learning resources in e-PBL (Hallinger 2005;Valaitis et al 2005;de Leng et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As creation tools and costs became easily accessible, VPs are finally replacing the "paper" cases in medical problem-based learning [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%