2006
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Repetition of Suicidal Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
116
4
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
116
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The repetition rate of 2.7% (n=9) at one year follow up is substantially lower than the rates of repetition reported in the West, where the estimated one year repetition rate of non-fatal self-harm has been reported to be 16.3% [2,3,6,11]. A limitation of this study is that only 35.3% of the original sample was available for follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The repetition rate of 2.7% (n=9) at one year follow up is substantially lower than the rates of repetition reported in the West, where the estimated one year repetition rate of non-fatal self-harm has been reported to be 16.3% [2,3,6,11]. A limitation of this study is that only 35.3% of the original sample was available for follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Sri Lanka has an increasing rate of non-fatal self-harm by self-poisoning, but data on repetition rates are limited [4]. The SUPRE-MISS longitudinal follow-up study [5] reported that the repetition rate at 18 months in Sri Lanka was 4% (treatment as usual group) -substantially lower than the estimated one year repetition rate of 16% reported in the West [3,6]. In contrast, the rate of previous selfharm in those who have died by suicide in Sri Lanka has been reported to be as high as 26% [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another misconception concerns the level of risk posed by self-cutting, often regarded as minimal in health care settings. In fact those who cut may have features indicative of high risk (Horrocks, Price, House, & Owens, 2003), tend to receive poor services (Horrocks et al, 2003;Kapur et al, 2008), and are more likely to repeat self-harm (Kapur et al, 2006) and die by suicide (Cooper et al, 2005) than those who poison themselves.…”
Section: Self-harm and Suicidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include socio-demographic factors such as age (Christiansen and Jensen, 2007;Corcoran et al, 2004), unemployment (Tejedor et al, 1999), not being married (Kreitman and Foster, 1991) or low educational level (Christiansen and Jensen, 2007) which have been associated with repetition of suicidal behaviour (Osvath et al, 2003). Clinical factors include lethality of the index attempt (Gibb et al, 2005), poor physical health (Colman et al, 2004), and mental illness or psychiatric comorbidity, which has been noted to be a risk factor for repetition in studies on parasuicides (Colman et al, 2004;Osvath et al, 2003), non-fatal suicidal behaviours (Kapur et al, 2006) and SAs among inpatients (Spiessl et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%