1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01063904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The renormalisation group and effective field theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective theories have proven to be a powerful tool for the investigation of the physical world; when combined with group theoretic arguments, they have allowed for principled exploration of phenomena where the underlying mechanisms remain unclear or unknown [43]. We have shown here how effective theories can extend to irreversible, dissipative and out-of-equilibrium systems with a demonstration that relates an underlying mechanism (the Boolean circuits) to a higher-level decomposition that permits coarse-graining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Effective theories have proven to be a powerful tool for the investigation of the physical world; when combined with group theoretic arguments, they have allowed for principled exploration of phenomena where the underlying mechanisms remain unclear or unknown [43]. We have shown here how effective theories can extend to irreversible, dissipative and out-of-equilibrium systems with a demonstration that relates an underlying mechanism (the Boolean circuits) to a higher-level decomposition that permits coarse-graining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 There are, of course, exceptions. Teller ([1989], [1995]) and Huggett and Weingard ([1995]) examine perturbative renormalization from a philosophical perspective. There has also been discussion of virtual particles (Weingard [1988]; Redhead [1988]) and Feynman diagrams (Meynel, 2008;Wüthrich, 2012) in the philosophical literature, which engages with QFT perturbation theory.…”
Section: Three Worries About Perturbative Quantum Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What makes the proposal of Cao and Schweber particularly ambitious is that in addition to the hierarchal picture of nature just described, they also conclude that EFTs "support a pluralism in theoretical ontology, an antifoundationalism in epistemology and an antireductionism in methodology" (p.69). I will return briefly to this more extreme claim when discussing the criticism of [32], but for the moment I simply endorse the conclusion of [33] that this constitutes a significant overreach and is not at all entailed by the success of the effective field theory approach. However, one need not subscribe wholesale to Cao and Schweber's conclusions in order to hold onto the belief that an ontology of quasi-autonomous domains is licensed by the Decoupling Theorem.…”
Section: A Uniform Notion Of Naturalnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 For an excellent review, see [13]. 33 Of particular relevance here, the GIM mechanism banishes so-called flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNC) from the theory. The presence of these currents implied that certain kaon decay processes, such as k → µµ, should occur at rates much higher than experimentally observed.…”
Section: A Uniform Notion Of Naturalnessmentioning
confidence: 99%