2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The removal of heavy metal cations by sulfidated nanoscale zero-valent iron (S-nZVI): The reaction mechanisms and the role of sulfur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in binding energy between SMBA and the other two sorbents could be explained by the fact that the SMBA had 2.83% S content on the surface; meanwhile, no S content was observed on the surface of both BA and SBA ( Table S1 ). Sulfur has a high affinity toward heavy metals, and its interaction is generally used to remove ionic forms of heavy metals in solutions or soil [ 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in binding energy between SMBA and the other two sorbents could be explained by the fact that the SMBA had 2.83% S content on the surface; meanwhile, no S content was observed on the surface of both BA and SBA ( Table S1 ). Sulfur has a high affinity toward heavy metals, and its interaction is generally used to remove ionic forms of heavy metals in solutions or soil [ 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreasing Pd 2+ /Pd 0 and increasing O β /O α ratios in XPS analysis also confirms the deposition of NH 4 HSO 4 and PdSO 4 on Used-S and Used-H catalysts. Both SO 4 2− and S 2− species are detected in the peaks of S 2p XPS spectra for the Used-S catalyst, 18,26 while only SO 4 2− species are found in the Used-H catalyst surface. It can be speculated that these results can be attributed to the possibly occurred surface reactions of (i) SO 2ads + O 2− → SO 3 2− ads , (ii) SO 3 2− ads + 1/2 O 2ads → SO 4 2− , and (iii) SO 2ads + 4(−OH) → S ads + 2 H 2 O + 4(−O) under dry conditions; (i) and (ii) are the main reaction, and only a small amount of adsorbed SO 2 is reduced to S 2− by Brønsted acidic sites (−OH).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As shown in Figure 4d, the peaks of S 2p XPS spectra at 168.38 and 161.75 eV came from SO 4 2− and S 2− species, respectively. 18,26 Both SO 4 2− and S 2− species are detected on the Used-S catalyst surface, while only SO 4 2− species were found on the Used-H catalyst surface. Additionally, no peak corresponding to SO 3 2− species is detected on the catalyst surface.…”
Section: Effects Of So 2 Poisoning On Cbco + Scrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to its slow removal rate of some pollutants, narrow range of active pH value (Bounab et al 2021), easy agglomeration and other problems, researchers focus more on iron nanoparticles modification to overcome its shortcomings. At present, the main modification measures include green synthetic iron nanoparticles, sulfide-modified iron nanoparticles, supported iron nanoparticles, and stabilized-modified iron nanoparticles (Zhang et al 2018(Zhang et al , 2020Liang et al 2021). Although there are numerous modification methods at present, sulfide modification materials are more breakthrough because of their environmental friendliness and high reactivity.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current studies have investigated that sulfidated iron nanoparticles had some limitations in the practical application, such as the complex synthesis schemes, the use of dangerous reducing reagents and the introduction of boron impurities during the synthesis process (Liang et al 2021). Therefore, it is necessary to develop a more environmental and economic friendly method.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%