2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions by waste materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Thus, biosorption might occur between adsorbate and adsorbent (Sari and Tuzen 2009;Rahaman et al 2008). The results of this study showed that Cd might have bound to applied organic amendments that helped in 95 % Cd removal after 13 h from artificially Cd-polluted water.…”
Section: Cadmium Removal Efficiency Of Organic Amendmentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…). Thus, biosorption might occur between adsorbate and adsorbent (Sari and Tuzen 2009;Rahaman et al 2008). The results of this study showed that Cd might have bound to applied organic amendments that helped in 95 % Cd removal after 13 h from artificially Cd-polluted water.…”
Section: Cadmium Removal Efficiency Of Organic Amendmentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Nowadays, there is a trend to use the alternative and low-cost materials for arsenic removal from the waters in laboratory or medium-scale experiments. Effectiveness of chemically modified or native biomass in processes of arsenic removal was evaluated and proved by various authors (Abdel-Ghani et al, 2007;Boddu et al, 2008;Cernansky et al, 2007;Loukidou et al, 2003;Malakootian et al, 2009;Murugesan et al, 2006;Rahaman et al, 2008;Seki et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both organic and inorganic compounds of arsenic are present in the environment. The inorganic arsenic is highly toxic (Rahaman et al, 2008). In high concentrations, arsenic poisoning can also lead to an acute condition called arsenicosis (Hering et al, 1997;Gregor, 2001;Saha et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional methods for removal of iron, arsenic and coliform bacteria involve coagulation followed by separation of the produced insoluble settling or by direct filtration through sand beds. Arsenic removal by various methods includes reverse osmosis, ion exchange, lime softening, flotation and adsorption on iron oxides or activated alumina (Kartinen and Martin, 1995); waste materials (Rahaman et al, 2008); iron oxide fungal biomass (Pokhrel and Viraraghavan, 2008), aquatic macrophytes (Rai et al, 1995) and hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) (Nemade et al, 2007). These conventional water treatment methods are not affordable in rural communities of developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%