2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The removal of additional edges in the edge detection of potential field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sertcelik and Kafadar (2012) introduced the two-dimensional structure tensor with Gaussian function convolution for the potential field edge detecting, but the method failed to outline the deep and shallow anomalies simultaneously. Then Ma and Huang (2015) presented a new method normalizing the defined edge detector, which used the ratio of the vertical derivative and total horizontal derivatives of the 2D structure tensor eigenvalue. pointed the Gaussian envelop will smooth the potential field data, and redefined the structure tensor eigenvalue without the Gaussian envelop to make the detected edges more clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sertcelik and Kafadar (2012) introduced the two-dimensional structure tensor with Gaussian function convolution for the potential field edge detecting, but the method failed to outline the deep and shallow anomalies simultaneously. Then Ma and Huang (2015) presented a new method normalizing the defined edge detector, which used the ratio of the vertical derivative and total horizontal derivatives of the 2D structure tensor eigenvalue. pointed the Gaussian envelop will smooth the potential field data, and redefined the structure tensor eigenvalue without the Gaussian envelop to make the detected edges more clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While so many edge detectors are available, no single method can provide all of the needs for the image analysis, and specific flaws are noted in each of the algorithms. Wellknown cases are as follows: the curvature gravity gradient tensor technique [23] has trouble with both positive and negative anomalies [33] and has the problem of simultaneously displaying large and small amplitude edges [34]; the vertical derivative, total horizontal derivative, and the combination of the two methods are difficult to clearly display the edges of deeper anomalies [35]. Other detectors, such as the analytic signal and local wavenumber techniques, are sensitive to gridding and noise [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooper and Cowan (2006) proposed an improvement on the tilt angle TDX method to identify the anomaly boundaries, whilst Cooper (2009) proposed the adoption of the Hilbert transform method for geologic boundary delineation, a method that analyzes signals and could clearly show the magnetic source boundaries. Ma et al (2012Ma et al ( , 2013Ma et al ( , 2015 put forward the enhanced equalization and local phase filters for edge detection by integrating the different order horizontal derivatives. Li (2014) used the normalized total horizontal derivative method to obtain the horizontal location and depth of the anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%