2012
DOI: 10.15804/ppsy2012028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Remembrance of the Katyń Massacre and President Lech Kaczyński's Concept of Polish–Russian Relations [2005–2010]

Abstract: Lech Kaczyński’s tragic death was a direct cause of the détente in PolishRussian relations, proclaimed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin just after the Polish Air Force Tu-154 Crash. However this rapprochement is far from the political concept of the President. Considering the Polish internal debate on a proper form of Polish-Russian relations, I would like – in this short article to present a way as to how President Kaczyński understood challenges, that both nations have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is interesting, this argument even applies to Poland's policy towards Russia in [2005][2006][2007], when the Law and Justice Party (in Polish: Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS) held power. Such a view may seem odd, as many researchers note a deterioration in Polish-Russian relations at that period and usually ascribe it to nationalist attitudes on part of PiS (Kuźniar 2012;Zięba 2013: 182-199;Wawrzyński 2012;Mal'gin 2011: 11-12;Taras 2014;Stolarczyk 2016: 195-206).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is interesting, this argument even applies to Poland's policy towards Russia in [2005][2006][2007], when the Law and Justice Party (in Polish: Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS) held power. Such a view may seem odd, as many researchers note a deterioration in Polish-Russian relations at that period and usually ascribe it to nationalist attitudes on part of PiS (Kuźniar 2012;Zięba 2013: 182-199;Wawrzyński 2012;Mal'gin 2011: 11-12;Taras 2014;Stolarczyk 2016: 195-206).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%