2018
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The REMBRANDT study, a large collection of genomic data from brain cancer patients

Abstract: The Rembrandt brain cancer dataset includes 671 patients collected from 14 contributing institutions from 2004–2006. It is accessible for conducting clinical translational research using the open access Georgetown Database of Cancer (G-DOC) platform. In addition, the raw and processed genomics and transcriptomics data have also been made available via the public NCBI GEO repository as a super series GSE108476. Such combined datasets would provide researchers with a unique opportunity to conduct integrative ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
126
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e). To confirm this we used microarray data from the REMBRANDT study and GZMA gene expression as a simple surrogate for immune infiltration . This analysis confirmed the significantly higher expression of multiple immunosuppressive functions in patients with increased expression of anti‐tumour effector functions (Supporting information, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e). To confirm this we used microarray data from the REMBRANDT study and GZMA gene expression as a simple surrogate for immune infiltration . This analysis confirmed the significantly higher expression of multiple immunosuppressive functions in patients with increased expression of anti‐tumour effector functions (Supporting information, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…To compare the expression of selected genes in different patient groups we used RNAseq data from TCGA [obtained via The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) ], assigning patients to either CIC2 or CIC4 (as above). In addition, we used microarray data from the REMBRANDT study downloaded from Betastasis.com. For REMBRANDT, patient samples were classified as granzyme A (GZMA) high expressors or GZMA low expressors based on the median expression value ( n = 214).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGALS9) and FOXP3 were also expressed at significantly higher levels in CIC2 than CIC4 ( Figure 4D), as were genes encoding soluble mediators of immunosuppression such IL10, TGFB1 and IDO1 ( Figure 4E). To confirm this we used microarray data from the REMBRANDT study (17) and GZMA gene expression as a simple surrogate for immune infiltration (35). This analysis confirmed the significantly higher expression of multiple immunosuppressive functions in patients with increased expression of anti-tumour effector functions (Supplementary Figure 6).…”
Section: A Spectrum Of Immune Activity In Gbm Patientsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To compare expression of selected genes in different patient groups we used RNAseq data from TCGA (obtained via TCIA (7)), assigning patients to either CIC2 or CIC4 (as above). In addition, we used microarray data from the REMBRANDT study (17) downloaded from Betastasis.com. For REMBRANDT, patient samples were classified as GZMA high expressors or GZMA low expressors based on the median expression value (n=214).…”
Section: Differential Expression Of Genes In Gbm Cic2 and Cic4 And Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess gene expression in human glioma samples, public expression datasets 369 GSE50161 (Griesinger et al, 2013), GSE36245 (Sturm et al, 2012), GSE16011 370 (Gravendeel et al, 2009), GSE7696 (Murat et al, 2008), GSE43378 (Kawaguchi et al, 371 2013), GSE53733 (Reifenberger et al, 2014), GSE57872 (Patel et al, 2014), 372 GSE108474 (Gusev et al, 2018), GSE118793, GSE4290 (Sun et al, 2006), GSE89567 373 (Venteicher et al, 2017), and TCGA (Brennan et al, 2013) were analysed and 374 visualised using the R2: microarray analysis and visualization platform 375 (http://r2.amc.nl) as previously described (Bunt et al, 2010). Gene set enrichment 376 analyses were performed using The Database for Annotation, Visualization and 377…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%