The Religionism Factor After 25 Years

Brown, Les

doi:10.1080/00223980.1981.9915197

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Simultaneously, Kulp and Davidson (1934) isolated Conservatism as a first factor in another heterogeneous set of items. Since then, factor analyses of such item pools have consistently identified a Conservatism or a Religiousness factor (Brown, 1981; Comrey & Newmeyer, 1965; Eysenck, 1944, 1954, 1971; Ferguson, 1939, 1940, 1942, 1973; Gorsuch & McFarland, 1972; Johnson, 1942; Lorr et al, 1973; Sanai, 1952; G. D. Wilson, 1970).…”

Section: What Is the Structure Of Individual Differences In Social At...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…D. Wilson, 1970). Other studies have noted the high correlations of independently developed measures of Conservatism and Religiousness (Gorsuch, 1984; Walkey, Katz, & Green, 1990)—Religiousness typically denoting “a conservative form of religion” that “relates to social or sexual control” (Brown, 1981, p. 9). The most popular measure of Conservatism at present, Wilson's Conservatism (C) Scale (G.…”

Section: What Is the Structure Of Individual Differences In Social At...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Isms and the structure of social attitudes.

Saucier¹

2000

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

239

286

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social attitude measurement has been limited by inadequate structural models. In this study, broad, basic dimensions were sought, with the assumption that crucial variables are represented as terms ending in -ism (isms). 266 isms were extracted from a dictionary, and items were built from their definitions. In a sample of 500 college students, the most replicable item structure had 3 factors; one of these 3 factors split into 2 factors in the 4-factor structure. A replication study confirmed that Conservatism and Authoritarianism are subcomponents of the largest factor. The other factors, though highly meaningful, seem more sparsely represented in previous research. No factor was highly related to personality traits other than Openness to Experience. The factors can serve as content-validity benchmarks for developing improved measurement models in this consequential, discrete domain of individual differences.

show abstract