1941
DOI: 10.2307/360925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Religion of Geology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geology, once conceived as the most effective tool for the disclosure of divine purposes in the natural order, was now challenging religion on several fronts: Whereas Christianity imagined the earth to be 6 thousand years old, Lyell understood it to be more like several million years; and where the former conceived of the original creation as taking place over a period of 6 days, the latter substituted an indefinite period of time (Dillenberger, 1960;Haber, 1959;Millhauser, 1959). To be sure, this shift points to a significant difference in outlook between those modern men of science, known for their sedulous preoccupation for natural processes, and their devout predecessors, who, like Adam Sedgwick (1785-1873) and Benjamin Silliman (1779-1864), traditionally gave the transcendent the determining role in their interpretations (Gillispie, 1951;Millhauser, 1959;Wright, 1941). But though it would be inaccurate to depict uniformitarianism as singly responsible for the decline in the plausibility of a Mosaic geology, it is clear that, despite attempts by conservatives to preserve a literal reading of Genesis, and notwithstanding the efforts of progressivists to accommodate a naturalistic interpretation with divine superintendence, the general thrust of Lyell's theory attenuated a traditional religious cosmology (Brooke, 1991;Conser, 1993;Gillispie, 1951;Greene, 1974;Millhauser, 1959).…”
Section: Lyellelian Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geology, once conceived as the most effective tool for the disclosure of divine purposes in the natural order, was now challenging religion on several fronts: Whereas Christianity imagined the earth to be 6 thousand years old, Lyell understood it to be more like several million years; and where the former conceived of the original creation as taking place over a period of 6 days, the latter substituted an indefinite period of time (Dillenberger, 1960;Haber, 1959;Millhauser, 1959). To be sure, this shift points to a significant difference in outlook between those modern men of science, known for their sedulous preoccupation for natural processes, and their devout predecessors, who, like Adam Sedgwick (1785-1873) and Benjamin Silliman (1779-1864), traditionally gave the transcendent the determining role in their interpretations (Gillispie, 1951;Millhauser, 1959;Wright, 1941). But though it would be inaccurate to depict uniformitarianism as singly responsible for the decline in the plausibility of a Mosaic geology, it is clear that, despite attempts by conservatives to preserve a literal reading of Genesis, and notwithstanding the efforts of progressivists to accommodate a naturalistic interpretation with divine superintendence, the general thrust of Lyell's theory attenuated a traditional religious cosmology (Brooke, 1991;Conser, 1993;Gillispie, 1951;Greene, 1974;Millhauser, 1959).…”
Section: Lyellelian Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%