The reliability, validity and screening effect of the happiness index scale among inpatients in a general hospital

Abstract

Background The Happiness Index Scale (HIS) is a newly developed scale by our group to screen for common psychological illnesses among general hospital inpatients. This study aimed to analyze the reliability, validity and screening effect of the HIS and to explore its clinical application. Methods From April 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, a total of 8405 continuous inpatients were enrolled from different departments of a large tertiary general hospital with 1385 inpatient beds in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. Using a cross-sectional survey design, each participant was assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9(PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 items(GAD-7), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and HIS within 24 h of admission. McDonald's ω coefficient, the Guttman split-half coefficient and the test–retest reliability coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability of the HIS and the construct validity and criterion validity of the validity tests. Scores on the PHQ-9, GAD-7, AIS, and C-SSRS were used as the gold standard tools to analyze the screening effect of the HIS. Results The HIS exhibited very good reliability, with a McDonald's ω coefficient of 0.825, a Guttman split-half coefficient of 0.920 and a test–retest reliability coefficient of 0.745 (P < 0.05). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory model fitting index with a χ2/df = 2.602, a root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) of 0.014, a standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) of 0.010, a comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.992, and a Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) of 0.983. The correlation coefficient between the total score of each dimension of the scale and the corresponding criterion was 0.854 ~ 0.949 (P < 0.001). The HIS showed a very good distinguishing effect. The average HIS score of inpatients who screened positive for psychological problems was significantly higher than that of inpatients who screened negative for psychological problems (t = 3790.619, P < 0.001). The effect size was very large (Cohens d = 2.695, 95% CI = 2.630 ~ 2.761). Approximately 90.2% of the positive and negative screening results of the HIS were matched with the gold standard tools, with a kappa value of 0.747 (P < 0.001). The screening effect test showed a sensitivity (true positive rate) of 92.9% and a specificity (true negative rate) of 89.5%. Conclusion The HIS exhibited satisfactory reliability and validity and a clinically meaningful screening effect with a much shorter version compared to the commonly used screening scales. Thus, it could potentially be useful as the first screening step to rule out psychological conditions for inpatients in general hospitals or to remind medical teams of further psychological concerns.

The Association of Illness Uncertainty and Hope With Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-sectional Study of Psychological Distress in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Women

“…The GAD-7 score greater than 9 was used as the cutoff of anxiety symptoms 31 . The Chinese version of GAD-7 has been validated in Chinese clinical patients 30,31 . The GAD-7 showed good reliability (α coefficient = 0.928) in this study.…”

“…The Chinese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) 30 was applied to measure the severity of anxiety over the past 2 weeks. The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-rating scale, and each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).…”

The COVID-19 pandemic and mental health outcomes – A cross-sectional study among health care workers in Coastal South India

“…The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) are standard questionnaires which have been used worldwide for measuring depression, anxiety and insomnia in various settings, with good reliability and internal consistency. [27][28][29] The psychometric properties of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in Indian population were found to be comparable to western settings. 30 The internal reliability for PHQ-9 has been reported to be excellent with Cronbach's α of 0.89 in primary care studies.…”

Multidimensional Outcomes of IV Thrombolysis in Minor Ischemic Stroke: Motor, Psychocognitive, and Dependence

“…The mood of patients was assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). 17 , 18 The PHQ-9 was used to evaluate depression during the past 2 weeks, with a total score of 27 points and the higher score means severe depression conditions. The GAD-7 was used to assess anxiety during the past 2 weeks, with a total score of 21 points and the higher score means severe anxiety conditions.…”