2017
DOI: 10.17219/acem/69804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of three psoriasis assessment tools: Psoriasis area and severity index, body surface area and physician global assessment

Abstract: Background. A wide variety of psoriasis assessment tools have been proposed to evaluate the severity of psoriasis in clinical trials and daily practice. The most frequently used clinical instrument is the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI); however, none of the currently published severity scores used for psoriasis meets all the validation criteria required for an ideal score.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the tools used to measure the severity and extent of the lesions is the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). This index quantifies the severity of erythema, induration, desquamation and area affected (head, arms, trunk and legs) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the tools used to measure the severity and extent of the lesions is the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). This index quantifies the severity of erythema, induration, desquamation and area affected (head, arms, trunk and legs) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches are incomparable, and it must be assumed that BSA measurements by the PASI approach are less prone to extensive miscalculations as inaccuracies in one of the areas may be better compensated by correct values in the remaining three areas. 18 Our analyses in a much larger patient cohort revealed an intraobserver ICC of 0.862 and interobserver ICC of 0.924 for the BSA assessment. Of note, the statistical scattering of the results for the severity of erythema and scaling in our study was small which, inter alia, is caused by a limited range of the 0-4 scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In contrast, BSA measurements within PASI are performed separately for each of the four anatomical regions. Both approaches are incomparable, and it must be assumed that BSA measurements by the PASI approach are less prone to extensive miscalculations as inaccuracies in one of the areas may be better compensated by correct values in the remaining three areas . Our analyses in a much larger patient cohort revealed an intraobserver ICC of 0.862 and interobserver ICC of 0.924 for the BSA assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Among adolescents with clinically confirmed psoriasis, the disease severity was assessed and scored using both Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA). PASI assesses redness, scaling, infiltration and area of the involved skin, whereas BSA includes only the area 56. The distribution of psoriasis was noted and marked on a diagram and the present psoriasis phenotype was recorded.…”
Section: Cohort Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%