2009
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of three depression rating scales in a general population of Dutch older persons

Abstract: The CES-D was the most reliable scale for measuring depressive symptoms in a non-clinically depressed older population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Test-retest coefficients have been collected for the several psychometric instruments. [79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-retest coefficients have been collected for the several psychometric instruments. [79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploration of the psychometric properties showed a high internal consistency, moderate test-retest correlations and substantial evidence of construct validity [25]. The psychometric properties of the Dutch translation showed favorable results [24,26,27]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. A recent study showed limited reliability of this version compared to other measures of depression in a nonclinical elderly population [24]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could only study recent symptoms of depression and did not have information about how long the depressive symptoms lasted. However, as we describe previously, the CES-D has been widely used in epidemiological studies, has demonstrated excellent reliability (Gonzalez et al, 2017; Shinar et al, 1986; van de Rest et al, 2010) and validity (Radloff, 1977), and appears to be a robust measure of depressive symptoms in Hispanic/Latino populations (Gonzalez et al, 2017). Future genetic studies of lifetime depressive disorder in Hispanic/Latino samples are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was also shown in the current study population to have excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alphas = .80–.86), test-retest reliability ( rs = .41–.70), and moderate to high correlations with other measures of depressive or mental health symptoms, including the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory ( r = .72, p < .001), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ( r = .80, p < .001), and the Short Form-12’s Mental Component Summary ( r = −.65, p < .001) (Gonzalez et al, 2017). While the inter-rater reliability of CES-D-10 has not previously been assessed, the full 20-item CES-D has demonstrated good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability ( rs = .67–.76) (Shinar et al, 1986; van de Rest, van der Zwaluw, Beekman, de Groot and Geleijnse, 2010). Total depressive symptoms scores were calculated by summing responses to each item; item responses ranged from 0 = rarely or none of the time (< 1 day) to 3 = all of the time (5–7 days).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%