2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-4124-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review

Abstract: Only 13% of studies were of good quality and inconsistency in reported reliability estimates was found. Although the reliability was adequate in good quality studies, further improvement is desirable. From a methodological perspective, the quality of reliability studies needs to be improved. From a clinical perspective, a renewed focus on training/education and standardization of assessment is required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
1
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
125
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This is partly addressed by the validation of this approach by the IMPACT model 1021 Second, there is some variability in the reporting of GCS, such that ‘first’ GCS is sometimes used interchangeably with ‘postresuscitation’ GCS 21. Third, we have not addressed the decision-making with regard to transfer of patients from peripheral to neurosurgical centres, and the possibility of regional variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly addressed by the validation of this approach by the IMPACT model 1021 Second, there is some variability in the reporting of GCS, such that ‘first’ GCS is sometimes used interchangeably with ‘postresuscitation’ GCS 21. Third, we have not addressed the decision-making with regard to transfer of patients from peripheral to neurosurgical centres, and the possibility of regional variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A score of 13 to 15 indicates a mild brain injury, 10 to 12 a moderate brain injury, and 3 to 8 a severe brain injury. The reliability of the GCS has been reviewed on 52 studies with seven deemed high-quality studies whose intra-class correlation coefficients indicated the GCS to be reliable and valid measure of neurocognitive state (Reith et al, 2016). …”
Section: Methods and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), first introduced in 1974 by Teasdale G et al ., was created to simplify assessment of the depth and duration of impaired consciousness and coma 3 . It provides a structured and objective grading system for bedside assessment 4 . In clinical settings, such as the intensive care unit and neurosurgical unit, it has been used universally for more than 40 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%