A taxon is a notiarbitrary class whose existence is conjectured as ati etnpirical question, not a tnere setnatitic cotivenietice. Numerous taxa are ktiown to exist iti tiature atid society (chemical elements, biological species, organic diseases, geological strata, kitids of stars, elementary particles, races, cultures, Mendelizing mental deficiencies, major psychoses, vocations, ideologies, religions). What personality types, if any, occur in the nonpathological population remains to be researched by sophisticated methods, and cannot be settled by fiat or "dimensional" preference. The intuitive concept of taxonicity is to be explicated by a combination of formal-numerical and causal criteria. Taxometric methods should include consistency tests that provide Popperian risk of strong discorroboration. In social science, latent class methods are probably more useful than cluster algorithms.In the academic year 1939-40,1 took a course in individual differences (regularly taken by all psychology majors at Minnesota in those days) from one of the "greats" of applied psychology, Donald G. Paterson, a founder of what was then called the "student personnel movement." A main theme of Paterson's lectures was that there are no types of persons, that categorical terminology (e.g., "introvert," "bright," "thin") is merely a convenient-and sometimes careless-way of demarcating rough regions on what are in reality quantitative traits, dimensions, or factors. He pointed out, for instance, that Jung had a typology of introverts and extraverts, but then had to add ambiverts, which is where Requests for reprints should be addressed to Paul E. Meehl, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0344.