Research in Psychopathology: Selected Readings. 1963
DOI: 10.1037/11397-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis: A New Look.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this order of reliability for a criterion it would have made an adequate prediction impossible. However, if an attempt is made to predict the generic diagnosis of neurosis the criterion shows itself to be more reliable, 0.71 (Schmidt & Fonda, 1956), 0.46 (Norris, 1959) and 0-53 (Kreitman et al, 1961). Even so the criterion is far from perfect and will, therefore, be difficult to predict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this order of reliability for a criterion it would have made an adequate prediction impossible. However, if an attempt is made to predict the generic diagnosis of neurosis the criterion shows itself to be more reliable, 0.71 (Schmidt & Fonda, 1956), 0.46 (Norris, 1959) and 0-53 (Kreitman et al, 1961). Even so the criterion is far from perfect and will, therefore, be difficult to predict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheier have defined neuroticism as 'those personality characteristics which actually differ significantly between clinically judged neurotics and normals '. This definition holds implicitly that reliable clinical judgments are consistent, yet at the present time diagnostic reliability in psychiatric practice is especially sub judice particularly amongst the neuroses (Hunt, Wittson & Hunt, 1953 ;Kreitman, 1961 ;Kreitman et al, 1961 ;Schmidt & Fonda, 1956).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even older studies do not warrant the usual assertion as regards major psychopathological taxa. For example, the classic study of Schmidt and Fonda (1956) is often cited for this purpose; but while that research showed grave unreliability in diagnosing many of the old rubrics (and especially their subdivisions), for the clinically important dichotomy schizophrenia/nonschizophrenia the interclinician reliability was .95, better than any psychometric instrument or normal range rating scale I could name. Each diagnostic category should be separately studied, employing skilled clinicians who have been trained in careful diagnosis and "believe in it" as something valid and worth doing.…”
Section: Some Current Objections To Taxonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidt and Fonda (1956) report on a study in which 426 patients were classified on the broad categories of schizophrenics versus nonschizophrenics. Three psychiatrists showed 91 per cent agreement on their diagnoses.…”
Section: Demography Sociology and Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%