2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of high resolution ultrasound in the identification of pus collections in head and neck swellings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During routine evaluation of pediatric neck masses, US has been regarded as the first choice, although there have been reports regarding its limitation in evaluating midline neck masses [7,8]. Ultrasound has demonstrated great diagnostic performance in assessing thyroid masses, branchial cysts, and parotid lesions [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During routine evaluation of pediatric neck masses, US has been regarded as the first choice, although there have been reports regarding its limitation in evaluating midline neck masses [7,8]. Ultrasound has demonstrated great diagnostic performance in assessing thyroid masses, branchial cysts, and parotid lesions [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound has demonstrated great diagnostic performance in assessing thyroid masses, branchial cysts, and parotid lesions [9]. Moreover, for the head, the reliability of high resolution US for the distinction between a collection of purulent material and swelling without purulence was reported to be high, showing a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 82%, respectively [7]. Despite this high diagnostic performance, drawback to the US is that US is examiner dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This percentage is in contrast to that obtained by various authors who analyzed nonspecific swelling in orofacial soft tissues. They evaluated lesions of probable inflammatory nature and found a sensitivity of 96 %, that is, the fraction of the patients who showed a positive response in the ultrasonographic examination among those individuals who had the disease [8][9][10][11][12]. On the contrary, Douglas et al [13] found a 65 % sensitivity for the examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computed tomography (CT) is of immense importance in diagnosing bone lesions but the radiation hazard and high cost limits its use. 4 Ultrasonic imaging is one of the most important, developing diagnostic tools today. State-of-the-art ultrasonic scanners offer real-time gray scale images of anatomical details with millimeter spatial resolution superimposed on which a map of Doppler blood flow information is displayed in full color.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%