2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of flexible nasolaryngoscopy in the identification of vocal fold movement impairment in young infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several anatomic and technical limitations raise diagnostic uncertainty, 2-4 especially with respect to degree of vocal cord movement. 6 However, the ability to record and replay examinations using high-definition equipment improves accuracy. 1 In the subgroup of patients included in this secondary study, a bedside diagnosis of left VCP after PDA repair occurred in 16.2% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several anatomic and technical limitations raise diagnostic uncertainty, 2-4 especially with respect to degree of vocal cord movement. 6 However, the ability to record and replay examinations using high-definition equipment improves accuracy. 1 In the subgroup of patients included in this secondary study, a bedside diagnosis of left VCP after PDA repair occurred in 16.2% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, recorded laryngoscopies of children at one month of age only provide moderate inter-rater reliability for degree of vocal cord movement in a small case-control study. 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ReliabilityInter-and intra-rater reliability was calculated using the generalised Fleiss's kappa 4,6,7 to compare with comparable studies reported in the literature. The kappa statistic ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 depicts that raters are in agreement only by chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any value over 0 may be interpreted as representing: poor (below 0.40), fair to good (between 0.40-0.75) and excellent (above 0.75) agreement beyond chance. The rating scale was considered as an ordinal scale and an ordinal weighting scheme was used in the computation of Fleiss's kappa 4,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation